The term “direct evidence” refers to evidence which proves a fact without inference or presumption. For example, if a witness testifies that it was raining outside when she entered the liquor store, that testimony is direct evidence that it was raining (compare with similar example provided for “Circumstantial Evidence”). Both direct and circumstantial evidence are acceptable types of evidence to prove or disprove the elements of a charge of cause of action and neither is entitled to any greater with than the other. Legal CitationsCalifornia Evidence Code § 410. “[D]irect evidence means evidence that directly proves a fact, without an inference or presumption, and which in itself, if true, conclusively establishes that fact.” State v. Baker, 438 P.2d 978, 980 (Or. 1968). “Direct evidence includes what is heard as well as what is seen; indeed, what is perceived by the senses.” Related entriesThis shows grade level based on the word's complexity. This shows grade level based on the word's complexity. evidence of a witness who testifies to the truth of the fact to be proved (contrasted with circumstantial evidence). SHALL WE PLAY A "SHALL" VS. "SHOULD" CHALLENGE? Should you take this quiz on “shall” versus “should”? It should prove to be a quick challenge! Which form is commonly used with other verbs to express intention? TAKE THE QUIZ TO FIND OUT direct dye, directed, directed angle, directed-energy device, directed verdict, direct evidence, direct examination, direct-examine, direct free kick, direct-grant school, direct injection Dictionary.com Unabridged Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2022
law evidence, usually the testimony of a witness, directly relating to the fact in disputeCompare circumstantial evidence Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 2012 Digital Edition © William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012 WORD OF THE DAY white holenoun | [wahyt hohl]SEE DEFINITION© 2022 Dictionary.com, LLC
Direct evidence is evidence that, if believed, tends to show a fact without need for any other amplification.","A.T. Dinkova-Kostova, et al., Direct evidence that sulfhydryl groups of Keap1 are the sensors regulating induction of phase 2 enzymes that protect against carcinogens and oxidants, Proc.","Wang, F., Wang, J., Liu, X., Direct evidence of a surface quenching effect on size‐dependent lumi- nescence of upconversion nanoparticles, Angew.","Accordingly, VOA is entitled to summary judgment on Nichols’s hostile work environment claim.2. Direct evidence of discrimination Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 make it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise discriminate against any individual with respect to her compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race.","This interpretation would be consistent with a market access view, where telegraph connections with the UK (and thus also with many other countries) increase the ability of firms in re- cipient countries to sell their products abroad.23 Direct evidence for this mechanism is provided by Steinwender (2018) and Juhasz and Steinwender (2018), who show that the telegraph increased trade volumes, particularly of upstream products.","Rickard, and Johnson made false statements, in writing and verbally, regarding Nichols and had other [VOA] employees make false statements about Nichols and compose false written statements about Nichols which were utlilized [sic] to place Nichols on administrative leave, to demote her, and to reduce her pay.65 Direct evidence of discrimination exists only in rare cases.","Direct evidence is simply the testimony, like the testimony of an eyewitness."],"id":"direct-evidence","title":"Direct evidence"},"groups":[{"snippetLinks":[{"key":"directly","type":"clause","offset":[21,29]},{"key":"fact","type":"definition","offset":[39,43]},{"key":"inference","type":"clause","offset":[52,61]},{"key":"true","type":"clause","offset":[86,90]},{"key":"establishes","type":"clause","offset":[105,116]},{"key":"include","type":"clause","offset":[150,157]},{"key":"oral","type":"clause","offset":[186,190]},{"key":"written-statements","type":"clause","offset":[194,212]},{"key":"a-student","type":"clause","offset":[216,225]},{"key":"cause","type":"clause","offset":[242,247]},{"key":"reasonable","type":"clause","offset":[250,260]},{"key":"teacher","type":"clause","offset":[261,268]},{"key":"existence","type":"clause","offset":[296,305]},{"key":"question","type":"clause","offset":[321,329]},{"key":"ambiguous","type":"clause","offset":[365,374]}],"snippet":"means evidence which directly proves a fact without inference and which in itself, if true, conclusively establishes that fact. Direct evidence would include unequivocal and unambiguous oral or written statements by a student which would not cause a reasonable teacher to speculate regarding the existence of the fact in question; it would not include equivocal or ambiguous oral or written statements by a student which would cause a reasonable teacher to speculate regarding the existence of the fact in question.","samples":[{"uri":"https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/statutesrules/idstat/Title33/T33CH5.pdf","label":"legislature.idaho.gov","score":8},{"uri":"https://charterschoolcenter.ed.gov/sites/default/files/files/field_publication_attachment/Idaho%20School%20Discipline%20Laws%20and%20Regulations.pdf","label":"charterschoolcenter.ed.gov","score":8},{"uri":"https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/sites/default/files/discipline-compendium/Idaho%20School%20Discipline%20Laws%20and%20Regulations.pdf","label":"safesupportivelearning.ed.gov","score":8}],"size":4,"hash":"e78532bed0756c5da8eeacbd6683ec1d","id":1},{"snippetLinks":[{"key":"evidence","type":"clause","offset":[6,14]},{"key":"immediately","type":"clause","offset":[21,32]},{"key":"points","type":"clause","offset":[33,39]},{"key":"the-question","type":"clause","offset":[43,55]},{"key":"issue","type":"clause","offset":[59,64]}],"snippet":"means evidence which immediately points to the question at issue.","samples":[{"uri":"http://icje.uga.edu/documents/Probate/Georgia%20Probate%20Ct.%20Benchbook,%204th%20Ed.%20(2010)%202011-2012%20Supplement.pdf","label":"icje.uga.edu","score":6},{"uri":"http://icje.uga.edu/documents/Probate/Revised%20Handbook%20PCJoGA%20(2010)%202011-2013%20Supplement.pdf","label":"icje.uga.edu","score":6},{"uri":"http://icje.uga.edu/documents/Probate/2011-2014_Benchbook_Supplement-Final9-2-14(1).pdf","label":"icje.uga.edu","score":3}],"size":3,"hash":"9a1ac989a20532c1d605b535e70bd9de","id":2},{"snippetLinks":[{"key":"context","type":"clause","offset":[8,15]},{"key":"evidence","type":"clause","offset":[22,30]},{"key":"sufficient","type":"clause","offset":[33,43]},{"key":"allow","type":"clause","offset":[47,52]},{"key":"the-jury","type":"clause","offset":[53,61]},{"key":"find","type":"clause","offset":[65,69]},{"key":"the-decision","type":"clause","offset":[75,87]},{"key":"placed","type":"definition","offset":[95,101]},{"key":"substantial","type":"clause","offset":[104,115]},{"key":"negative","type":"clause","offset":[116,124]},{"key":"reliance-on","type":"clause","offset":[125,136]},{"key":"criterion","type":"clause","offset":[155,164]},{"key":"church","type":"clause","offset":[196,202]},{"key":"quoting","type":"clause","offset":[225,232]},{"key":"metro","type":"clause","offset":[245,250]},{"key":"mgmt","type":"clause","offset":[252,256]},{"key":"corp","type":"clause","offset":[258,262]},{"key":"stray","type":"definition","offset":[300,305]},{"key":"vague","type":"definition","offset":[319,324]},{"key":"statements","type":"clause","offset":[326,336]},{"key":"conversation","type":"clause","offset":[349,361]},{"key":"social","type":"clause","offset":[371,377]},{"key":"settings","type":"clause","offset":[378,386]},{"key":"random","type":"clause","offset":[389,395]},{"key":"office","type":"clause","offset":[396,402]},{"key":"remarks","type":"clause","offset":[412,419]},{"key":"by-non","type":"clause","offset":[420,426]},{"key":"unrelated","type":"clause","offset":[476,485]},{"key":"contested","type":"clause","offset":[493,502]},{"key":"employment-decision","type":"clause","offset":[503,522]},{"key":"constitute","type":"clause","offset":[530,540]},{"key":"direct","type":"clause","offset":[541,547]}],"snippet":"in this context means evidence ‘“sufficient to allow the jury to find that the decision makers placed a substantial negative reliance on [the illegitimate criterion] in reaching their decision.’” Church, 605 F. App’x at 123 (quoting Glanzman v. Metro. Mgmt. Corp., 391 F.3d 506, 512 (3d Cir.2004)). “Stray remark[s],” “vague” statements, “innocuous conversation jabs” in social settings, “random office banter,” remarks by non-decisionmakers, and statements by decisionmakers unrelated to the contested employment decision do not constitute direct","samples":[{"uri":"https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/opinions/18-803.pdf","label":"www.ded.uscourts.gov","score":6},{"uri":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-ded-1_18-cv-00803/pdf/USCOURTS-ded-1_18-cv-00803-0.pdf","label":"www.govinfo.gov","score":6}],"size":2,"hash":"382b64663ee38bc6c3088e6323c22a72","id":3},{"snippetLinks":[{"key":"evidence","type":"clause","offset":[6,14]},{"key":"directly","type":"clause","offset":[21,29]},{"key":"fact","type":"definition","offset":[39,43]},{"key":"inference","type":"clause","offset":[52,61]},{"key":"true","type":"clause","offset":[86,90]},{"key":"establishes","type":"clause","offset":[105,116]}],"snippet":"means evidence which directly proves a fact without inference and which in itself, if true, conclusively establishes","samples":[{"uri":"https://legislature.idaho.gov/wp-content/uploads/statutesrules/idstat/Title33/T33CH5.pdf","label":"legislature.idaho.gov","score":5}],"size":1,"hash":"9e4216a5d26720cadc598c40552ae93c","id":4},{"snippetLinks":[{"key":"evidence-that","type":"clause","offset":[6,19]},{"key":"directly","type":"clause","offset":[20,28]},{"key":"fact","type":"definition","offset":[38,42]},{"key":"inference","type":"clause","offset":[55,64]},{"key":"presumption","type":"clause","offset":[68,79]},{"key":"true","type":"clause","offset":[105,109]},{"key":"establishes","type":"clause","offset":[124,135]}],"snippet":"means evidence that directly proves a fact, without an inference or presumption, and which in itself, if true, conclusively establishes that fact\"].)","samples":[{"uri":"https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/revpub/D071011.PDF","label":"www.courts.ca.gov","score":3}],"size":1,"hash":"3495bf4d5834cd95b36ba9bb7baffd92","id":5}],"nextCurs":""}} id=pagination-first-page> |