When are forensic psychologists good at predicting violence?

1. Singh J.P., Desmarais S.L., Hurducas C., Arbach-Lucioni K., Condemarin C., Dean K. International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: a global survey of 44 countries. Int J Forensic Mental Health. 2014;13:193–206. [Google Scholar]

2. Eastman N., Adshead G., Fox S., Latham R., Whyte S. Forensic psychiatry. Oxford University Press; 2012. Professional duties and personal integrity and conflicting ethical values. [Google Scholar]

3. Appelbaum P.S. Dangerous severe personality disorders: England's experiment in using psychiatry for public protection. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56(4):397–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. General Medical Council (GMC) 2013. Good medical practice: guidance for doctors – the duties of a doctor. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/duties_of_a_doctor.asp. [Google Scholar]

5. Eastman N. The ethics of clinical risk assessment and management: developing law and the role of mental health professionals. In: Gray N., Laing J., Noaks L., editors. Criminal justice, mental health and the politics of risk. Cavendish Publishing; 2002. [Google Scholar]

6. Buchanan A., Grounds A. Forensic psychiatry and public protection. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;198(6):420–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Gunn J. Future directions for treatment in forensic psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176(4):332–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Mullen P.E. Forensic mental health. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176(4):307–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Gostin L.O. University of California Press; 2001. Public health law: power, duty, restraint. [Google Scholar]

10. Wilkinson T.M. Contagious disease and self-defence. Res Publica. 2007;13:339–359. [Google Scholar]

11. Savulescu J. Future people, involuntary medical treatment in pregnancy and the duty of easy rescue. Utilitas. 2007;19:1–20. [Google Scholar]

12. Appelbaum P.S. A theory of ethics for forensic psychiatry. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25:233–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Fazel S., Singh J.P., Doll H., Grann M. Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;345:e4692. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Shepherd S.M. Violence risk instruments may be culturally unsafe for use with indigenous patients. Australas Psychiatry. 2016;24:565–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Shepherd S.M., Lewis-Fernandez R. Forensic risk assessment and cultural diversity – contemporary challenges and future directions. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2016;22:427–438. [Google Scholar]

16. Parry H. Rapist released halfway through sentence went on to attack three more while on parole including a schoolgirl who was raped in front of her boyfriend. Daily Mail. 2015 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3131895/Rapist-released-halfway-sentence-went-attack-three-parole-including-two-schoolgirls-raped-boys-with.html. [Google Scholar]

17. Shepherd S.M., Sullivan D. Covert and implicit influences on the interpretation of violence risk instruments. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2016 [Google Scholar]

18. Siontis G.C.M., Tzoulaki I., Castaldi P.J., Ioannidis J.P.A. External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:25–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Siontis and collaborators found that only 16% of new prediction models are validated by different authors within five years of their first use, and when external validation of tools did occur, predictive accuracy was generally reduced, Siontis G.C.M. External validation of new risk prediction models is infrequent and reveals worse prognostic discrimination. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(1):25–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Zhou J., Witt K., Xiang Y., Zhu X., Wang X., Fazel S. Violence risk assessment in psychiatric patients in China: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016;50:33–45. A recent Chinese review found that instruments developed in the West had significantly lower predictive accuracy when used in China compared to that reported for Western populations. See. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Singh J.P., Grann M., Fazel S. Authorship bias in violence risk assessment? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72484. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Singh J.P. Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: a methodological primer. Behav Sci Law. 2013;31:8–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Walker N. Dangerousness and mental disorder. R Inst Philos Suppl. 1994;37:179–190. p. at 182. [Google Scholar]

24. Sinnott-Armstrong W. Neural lie detection in courts. In: Buzzi E., Hyman S.E., Raichle M.E., Kanwisher N., Phelps E.A., Morse S.J., editors. Using imaging to identify deceit: scientific and ethical questions. American Academy of Arts and Sciences; 2009. pp. 35–39. [Google Scholar]

25. Ryberg J. Racial profiling and criminal justice. J Ethics. 2010;15:79–88. [Google Scholar]

26. Lever A. Why racial profiling is hard to justify: a response to Risse and Zeckhauser. Philos Public Affairs. 2005;33:94–110. [Google Scholar]

27. Nadelhoffer T., Bibas S., Grafton S., Kiehl K.A., Mansfield A., Sinnott-Armstrong W. Neuroprediction, violence, and the law: setting the stage. Neuroethics. 2012;5:67–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Amodio D.M., Devine P.G. Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;91:652–661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Lippert-Rasmussen K. Oxford University Press; 2013. Born free and equal? A philosophical inquiry into the nature of discrimination; p. 336. [Google Scholar]

30. Kahlenberg R.D. Basic Books; 1997. The remedy: class, race, and affirmative action; p. 386. [Google Scholar]

31. Scanlon T. Belknap Press; Blame: 2008. Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning; p. 247. [Google Scholar]

32. Lippert-Rasmussen K. Nothing personal: on statistical discrimination. J Polit Philos. 2007;15:385–403. [Google Scholar]

33. Lippert-Rasmussen K. “We are all different”: statistical discrimination and the right to be treated as an individual. J Ethics. 2010;15:47–59. [Google Scholar]

34. Fazel S., Chang Z., Fanshawe T., Långström N., Lichtenstein P., Larsson H. Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: derivation and external validation of a scalable tool. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(6):535–543. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Skeem J.L., Lowenkamp C.T. Risk, race, and recidivism: predictive bias and disparate impact. Soc Sci Res Netw. 2016 [Google Scholar]

36. Angwin J., Larson J., Mattu S., Kirchner L. Machine Bias: there's software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it's biased against blacks. ProPublica. 2016 https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing [accessed 02.12.16] [Google Scholar]

37. Barry-Jester A.M., Casselman B., Goldstein D. Should prison sentences be based on crimes that haven’t been committed yet? FiveThirtyEight. 2015 http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/prison-reform-risk-assessment/ [accessed 02.12.16] [Google Scholar]

38. Monahan J., Skeem J.L. Risk assessment in criminal sentencing. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:489–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]