What is the most common sites for healthcare-associated infections?

Goal

Prevent, reduce, and ultimately eliminate healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).

Overview

HAIs are infections that patients get while receiving treatment for medical or surgical conditions, and many HAIs are preventable. Modern healthcare employs many types of invasive devices and procedures to treat patients and to help them recover. Infections can be associated with procedures (like surgery) and the devices used in medical procedures, such as catheters or ventilators. HAIs are important causes of morbidity and  mortality in the United States and are associated with a substantial increase in health care costs each year.  At any one time in the United States, 1 out of every 25 hospitalized patients are affected by an HAI.1

HAIs occur in all types of care settings, including:

  • Acute care hospitals
  • Ambulatory surgical centers
  • Dialysis facilities
  • Outpatient care (e.g., physicians' offices and health care clinics)
  • Long-term care facilities (e.g., nursing homes and rehabilitation facilities)

The establishment of the Healthcare-Associated Infections objectives for Healthy People 2020 reflects the commitment of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to preventing HAIs. These high-priority objectives address central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.

Common types of HAIs include:

  1. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections
  2. Surgical site infections
  3. Bloodstream infections
  4. Pneumonia
  5. Clostridium difficile

Why Are Healthcare-Associated Infections Important?

HAIs are a significant source of complications across the continuum of care and can be transmitted between different health care facilities. However, recent studies suggest that implementing existing prevention practices can lead to up to a 70 percent reduction in certain HAIs.2 Likewise, recent modeling data suggests that substantial reductions in resistant bacteria, like MRSA, can be achieved through coordinated activities between health care facilities in a given region.3 The financial benefit of using these prevention practices is estimated to be $25 billion to $31.5 billion in medical cost savings.4

Risk factors for HAIs can be grouped into three general categories: medical procedures and antibiotic use, organizational factors, and patient characteristics.5 The behaviors of health care providers and their interactions with the health care system also influence the rate of HAIs.   

Studies have shown that proper education and training of health care workers increases compliance with and adoption of best practices (e.g., infection control, hand hygiene, attention to safety culture, and antibiotic stewardship) to prevent HAIs.5,6 Examples of best practices by a health care provider include careful insertion, maintenance, and prompt removal of catheters, as well as the careful use of antibiotics. Another example of a best practice is decolonization of patients with an evidence-based method to reduce transmission of MRSA in hospitals.7

Back to Top

Emerging Issues in Healthcare-Associated Infections

Healthy People 2020 objectives measure progress toward reducing the incidence of CLABSI and invasive MRSA infections. However, more work needs to be done. In addition, there are other major types of HAIs that HHS is working to prevent, including those caused by antibiotic-resistant pathologens: 

Research suggests that many of these infections are preventable. Efforts are under way to expand implementation of strategies known to prevent HAIs, advance development of effective prevention tools, and explore new prevention approaches.8 Many efforts to prevent HAIs have focused on acute care settings. Increasingly, health care delivery, including complex procedures, is being shifted to outpatient settings, such as ambulatory surgical centers, end-stage renal disease facilities, and long-term care facilities. These settings often have limited capacity for oversight and infection control compared to hospital-based settings. Because patients with HAIs, including HAIs caused by antibiotic resistance organisms, often move between various types of health care facilities, prevention efforts must also expand across the continuum of care.  Moreover, the challenges posed by antibiotic-resistant organisms and C. difficile are best addressed through coordinated action among health care facilities in a given region.

The National Action Plan to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections: Roadmap to Elimination contains strategies on preventing HAIs in non-acute care hospital settings and supports further research on how to identify and control HAIs in these settings and apply evidence-based approaches for reducing HAIs. 

1Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. Multistate Point-Prevalence Survey of Health Care–Associated Infections. New England Journal of Medicine 2014; 370:1198-208.

2Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU.  N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2725-32.

3Vital Signs: Estimated Effects of a Coordinated Approach for Action to Reduce Antibiotic-Resistant Infections in Health Care Facilities — United States; MMWR August 4, 2015; 64; 1-7 (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm64e0804a1.htm?s_cid=mm64e0804a1_w).

4Scott RD. The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in US hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.

5Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. AHRQ Publication No. 08-0043. Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2008 Apr. Available from: http://archive.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/resources/nursing/resources/nurseshdbk/index.html

6Safdar N, Abad C. Educational interventions for prevention of healthcare-associated infection: A systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):933-40.

7Huang SS, Septimus E, Kleinman K, et al.  Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection.  N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2255-2265.

8Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.  AHRQ’s Healthcare-Associated Infections Program:  Tools & Resources to Prevent HAIs.  Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/index.html  

Back to Top

  1. Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati G, Kainer MA, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(13):1198–208.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yokoe DS, Anderson DJ, Berenholtz SM, Calfee DP, Dubberke ER, Ellingson KD, et al. A compendium of strategies to prevent healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 updates. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(8):820–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai Y, Venkatachalam I, Tee NW, Tan TY, Kurup A, Wong SY, et al. Prevalence of Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Use Among Adult Inpatients in Singapore Acute-Care Hospitals: Results From the First National Point Prevalence Survey. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(suppl_2):S61–s7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cairns S, Gibbons C, Milne A, King H, Llano M, MacDonald L, et al. Results from the third Scottish National Prevalence Survey: is a population health approach now needed to prevent HAI? J Hosp Infect. 2018;99(3):312–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Point prevalence survey of healthcare associated infections and antimcrobial use in European acute care hospitals. Stockholm: ECDC; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Metsini A, Vazquez M, Sommerstein R, Marschall J, Voide C, Troillet N, et al. Point prevalence of healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic use in three large Swiss acute-care hospitals. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14617.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reilly J, Cairns S, Fleming S, Hewitt D, Lawder R, Robertson C, et al. Results from the second Scottish national prevalence survey: the changing epidemiology of healthcare-associated infection in Scotland. J Hosp Infect. 2012;82(3):170–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programmes at the national and acute health care facility level. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2016.

  9. Russo PL, Cheng AC, Mitchell BM, Hall L. Healthcare associated infections in Australia – tackling the “known unknowns”! Aust Health Rev. 2018;42(2):178–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McLaws M, Gold J, King K, Irwig L. The prevalence of nosocomial and community-acquired infections in Australian hospitals. Med J Aust. 1988;149(11–12):582–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell BG, Shaban RZ, MacBeth D, Wood C-J, Russo PL. The burden of healthcare-associated infection in Australian hospitals: a systematic review of the literature. Infect Dis Health. 2017;22(3):117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals – protocol version 5.3. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Hospital resources 2015–16: Australian hospital statistics. Health services series no. 78. Cat. no. HSE 190. Canberra: AIHW; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Russo PL, Stewardson A, Cheng AC, Bucknall T, Marimuthu K, Mitchell BG. Establishing the prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in Australian hospitals: protocol for the comprehensive healthcare associated infection National Surveillance (CHAINS) study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):e024924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morioka H, Hirabayashi A, Iguchi M, Tomita Y, Kato D, Sato N, et al. The first point prevalence survey of health care–associated infection and antimicrobial use in a Japanese university hospital: a pilot study. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(7):e119–e23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gravel D, Taylor G, Ofner M, Johnston L, Loeb M, Roth VR, et al. Point prevalence survey for healthcare-associated infections within Canadian adult acute-care hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2007;66(3):243–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care–associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grayson ML, Russo PL. The national hand hygiene initiative. Med J Aust. 2009;191(8):420–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.

  21. Australian Commission for Safety and Quality in Health Care. National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards: Commonwealth of Australia; 2011.

  22. Worth LJ, Bull AL, Spelman T, Brett J, Richards MJ. Diminishing surgical site infections in Australia: time trends in infection rates, pathogens and antimicrobial resistance using a comprehensive Victorian surveillance program, 2002-2013. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36(4):409–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goggin LS, van Gessel H, McCann RL, Peterson AM, Van Buynder PG. Validation of surgical site infection surveillance in Perth, Western Australia. Healthcare Infect. 2009;14(3):101–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Russo PL, Bull A, Bennett N, Boardman C, Burrell S, Motley J, et al. The establishment of a statewide surveillance program for hospital-acquired infections in large Victorian public hospitals: a report from the VICNISS coordinating Centre. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34(7):430–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 


Page 2

Factor All patients
(n = 2767)
Patients without HAI
(n = 2494)
Patients with HAI
(n = 273)
Patient Characteristics
Male 1465 (52.9%) 1297 (52.0%) 168 (61.5%)
Age group
  ≤ 29 179 (6.5%) 169 (6.8%) 10 (3.7%)
 30–39 243 (8.8%) 226 (9.1%) 17 (6.2%)
 40–49 276 (10.0%) 244 (9.8%) 32 (11.7%)
 50–59 352 (12.7%) 301 (12.1%) 51 (18.7%)
 60–69 498 (18.0%) 442 (17.7%) 56 (20.5%)
 70–79 585 (21.1%) 529 (21.2%) 56 (20.5%)
  ≥ 80 634 (22.9%) 583 (23.4%) 51 (18.7%)
Emergency admission 2330 (84.2%) 2100 (84.2%) 230 (84.2%)
Receiving antimicrobial therapya 1228 (44.4%) 961 (38.6%) 267 (97.8%)
Documented fever > 38 °C in last 24 h 161 (5.8%) 124 (5.0%) 37 (13.6%)
Current colonisation or infection with multi-resistant organism 285 (10.3%) 219 (8.8%) 66 (24.2%)
Exposures
 Peripheral vascular access device present 1528 (55.2%) 1383 (55.6%) 145 (53.1%)
 Central vascular access device present 410 (14.8%) 303 (12.2%) 107 (39.2%)
 Indwelling urinary catheter present 573 (20.7%) 483 (19.4%) 90 (33.0%)
 Ventilated 55 (2.0%) 40 (1.6%) 15 (5.5%)
 Length of stay – median days (IQR) 5 (2–10) 4 (2–8) 14 (7–28)
Medical Specialty
 Intensive Care Unit 170 (6.1%) 128 (5.1%) 42 (15.4%)
 General Medicine 557 (20.1%) 513 (20.6%) 44 (16.1)
 General Surgery 307 (11.1%) 261 (10.5%) 46 (16.5%)
 Orthopaedics 205 (7.4%) 174 (7.0%) 31 (11.4%)
 Cardiology 201 (7.3%) 191 (7.7%) 10 (3.7%)
 Other 1327 (48.0%) 1267 (50.8%) 173 (63.4%)
Hospital Peer Group
 Principal Referral 1937 (70.0%) 1739 (69.7%) 198 (72.5%)
 Group A hospital 830 (30.0%) 755 (30.3%) 75 (27.5%)
Location
 Major city hospital 2371 (85.7%) 2146 (86.0%) 225 (82.4%)
 Regional 396 (14.3%) 348 (14.0%) 48 (17.6%)

  1. Data are n (%) unless otherwise stated
  2. HAI healthcare associated infection, IQR interquartile range
  3. aExcluding surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis