What is reliability in financial accounting?

The two main sources of financial statement inaccuracy are deliberate dishonesty and incompetence. There are two principle ways to combat these problems. The first method is to regularly hire an outside accounting firm to audit the financial statements. In an audit, the outside accountant tests reported account balances for accuracy. As importantly, the auditor tests to see that the accounting principles used in recording transactions are in conformity with GAAP and applied on a consistent basis. Despite some notorious recent audit failures involving large corporations, the auditing process, in most cases, provides a reasonable safeguard against fraudulent and inaccurate financial reporting.

The second method used to prevent fraudulent and inaccurate financial reporting is the adoption of adequate internal controls. Internal controls are the policies and procedures that a business can take to safeguard its assets, insure accuracy of financial reporting, and prevent fraud. These methods are not mutually exclusive. In the best of all worlds, firms would have both good internal controls and regular audits.

Unfortunately, hiring outside auditors and having the very best internal controls can be expensive, especially for small firms. The question of how much money should be spent on auditing and internal controls is a matter of perspective and circumstances. For example, a small business owner who uses the financial statements for internal management purposes only, has little incentive to hire an outside auditor. On the other hand, small business lenders and outside investors have a much greater need for audited financial statements.

For many, if not most, small businesses, regular audits are an unnecessary expense. The same cannot be said about adequate internal controls. Even the smallest business can benefit from well-designed controls designed to prevent fraud, theft, and accounting errors. In fact, small business owners are more likely to be the victims, rather than the perpetrators, of financial statement fraud. All too frequently a lower level bookkeeper or accountant will “cook the books” in order to cover theft and embezzlement. For this reason, it is important to have some understanding of internal controls.

The Internal Controls In The Small Business Environment: The Key To Insuring The Reliability And Accuracy Of Financial Statements

As indicated above, internal controls are the policies and procedures that a firm uses to safeguard its assets, insure the accuracy of financial reporting, and prevent fraud. Insuring the accuracy of accounting information can involve something as simple as designing transaction registers and journals that minimize the mis-recording of transactions. Other common sense policies involve purchasing reliable accounting software and hiring well-qualified bookkeeping personnel to handle basic accounting tasks.

There are several widely used internal control procedures to prevent employee theft. Three of the most important controls are employee bonding, segregation and rotation of duties, and budgeting. Bonding is a form of commercial insurance that indemnifies a firm against employee theft. Usually, a background check is required to obtain bonding for any particular employee. Many umbrella commercial insurance policies include blanket employee theft coverage that does not require specific background checks.

Segregation of duties ensures that employees who handle cash or other assets do not also have access to accounting records. This prevents employees with access to both assets and accounting records from covering up their thefts.

Example. Miss Feasance is the bookkeeper for a small law firm. Her job responsibilities include writing checks and recording the disbursements in the check register and computerized check journal. She is also responsible for performing the monthly bank reconciliation. She notes that the owner never looks at the cancelled checks, so every month she writes a couple of $100 checks to herself, but records the disbursements as payments to a process server the firm uses to serve subpoenas. Neither the owner nor the outside accountant ever look at the cancelled checks. All they see are the entries in the general ledger. Because the firm normally spends between $1,500 and $2,000 per month in legitimate process service costs, the extra $100 or $200 payments go unnoticed.

The above fraud could have been prevented by not letting Miss Feasance have check signing authority. If she had check signing authority, someone else should have entered the disbursements in the general ledger and performed the bank reconciliations.

Another control involves shifting personnel into different job functions on a periodic basis or forcing employees to take vacations and having someone else perform their job functions for a certain period of time. The logic of this internal control is that certain frauds, such as lapping schemes, require the fraudster to maintain continuous control over a certain accounting function. Here is an example involving a lapping scheme.

Example. Miss Feasance’s bother Mal is the billing clerk for a psychotherapy clinic. He has devised a lapping scheme that works like this: at the beginning of every month he takes two or three payments made to the clinic and deposits the funds in his bank account. To cover this fraud, he does not steal subsequent payments from other customers but instead of crediting the payments to the correct patient accounts, he credits the payment to the patients whose payments he previously stole. In this way the stolen payments are not detected as long as the patients see their accounts credited for the amount they paid. The scheme works as long as there is a steady stream of payments made to the clinic and the lag between payment and crediting is not too great.

Mal Feasance’s scheme works as long as he can keep covering previous thefts with subsequent payments. The scheme would be detected if he took a long vacation or had his job responsibilities occasionally performed by someone else.

Budgeting is the process of predicting the operating revenues and expenses for the next accounting period. This process serves as an internal control when owners regularly compare current actual revenue and expense with budgeted amounts. Failure of actual results to fall within a reasonable range of budgeted amounts should cause the owners to investigate the reason for the variance.

Example. If the owner of Miss Feasance’s law practice would establish budgets for expenses and revenue, the extra $200 per month she was pocketing and recording as process serving fees, might cause a variance that could be investigated.

Reliability Principle is the accounting principle that concern about the reliability of financial information that records and present in the entity’s financial statements.

The principle of the reliability principle is that the transactions or event could records and present in the entity’s financial statements only if they could be verified with the reliable objective evidence.

This accounting concept is quite an importance for the users of financial information. If the information is not reliable, then the decision making will be unlikely correct.

What is reliability in financial accounting?

Reliability Principle is also important for the auditor to review the accounting records of the entity during their cause of audit.

If you want to discover more, here is the best seller book for accounting principle and it also has a good explanation about reliability principle.

Explanation:

Basically, the information in the financial statements is reliable if that information could be checked, reviewed, and verified by concerning person with objective evidence.

For example, the reliable evidence for financial transactions or event that records in financial statements is including original documents (invoices, contract, receipt, banks statements, etc), information that generates from the third party, or information that prepared by the auditor. This is how reliable evident from auditor’s perspective.

Reliability Principle motivates integrity over financial reporting of an entity. Financial Statements must be true and fair and it is free from any kind of bias. This is really mean for all type of stakeholders that use financial information.

The accounting transaction is considered to be reliable if it could assure the decision maker that the information captures the condition or events its purports to represent.

Reliability Principle involved with the following accounting principle or concept:

Advertisements
  • Neutrality: Financial statements or information must be prepared free from any bias
  • Fair presentation: Financial statements must be prepared in the true and fair view
  • Prudence: A high degree of caution must be taken into account when the assumption is required.
  • Completeness: All financial information, transactions, and event that should be included are including.
  • Accurate: Financial information must be completed and accurate.

The data or information is reliable unless it is able to verify by the third party, and it could be measured in a systematic manner.

Here are the key factors to consider if the accounting transactions are reliable:

Advertisements
  • Must be accurate: that means the information is support by reliable evidence like original invoice or contract. It must be able to check by the third party.
  • Free from bias: information is free from any kind of bias. It is present as it is.
  • Report what actually happens. The financial information must be recording what really happened. For example, if the entity got a penalty from the government amount approximately 500,000 USD. The entity should record this amount and disclose it properly in the financial statements. The users of financial information should be able to know what really happened in the entity if they use this information.
  • An individual would have arrived a similar conclusion if they are using the same information.
  • Be able to inspect by the third party. It means if an individual use the same accounting information, they will arrive the same or similar conclusion.

Conclusion:

In Reliability Principle, information:

  • Must be accurate
  • Free from bias
  • Report what happened
  • Be able to inspect
  • Can be concluded to a similar conclusion by different users