What is a high performance work system provide several specific examples of the elements in a high performance work system?

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, T. C., Nell, P. C., & Pedersen, T. (2013). Combining stocks and flows of knowledge: The effects of intra-functional and cross-functional complementarity. Global Strategy Journal, 3(4), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 345–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. (2012). Organizational learning research: Past, present and future. Development and Learning in Organizations, 23(2), 175–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis, (77/78), 345–348.

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, M., Jianqiao, L., Ghazanfar, F., & Abrar, M. (2012). The effect of perception of existence of HPWS on employee’s organizational commitment: A test of social exchange relationship and contingency perspective to implement HPWS in universities of China and Pakistan. Advances in Asian Social Science, 1(1), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batt, R., & Colvin, A. J. (2011). An employment systems approach to turnover: Human resources practices, quits, dismissals, and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 695–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resource management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32(6), 898–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., Witteloostuijn, A. V., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. J. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance: The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Strategic Direction, 62(6), 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, D. J., & Wang, B. B. (2011). The relationship among high performance work system, personal trust and organizational citizenship behavior—The moderating effect of distributive justice. Chinese Journal of Management, 08(5), 727–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, D. J., & Zhao, Y. (2011). The mechanism of high performance work system on enterprise performance: The mediating role of organizational trust. Soft Science, 25(4), 96–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clercq, D. D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2010). The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, D. K., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Erratum: Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Kok, J. M. P., & Den Hartog, D. (2006). High performance work systems, performance and innovativeness in small firms. EIM Scales Paper, 200520.

  • Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dew, N., Sarasathy, S., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Affordable loss: Behavioral economic aspects of the plunge decision. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(2), 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibella, A. J., Nevis, E. C., & Gould, J. M. (1996). Understanding organizational learning capability. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. R. (1992). Toward a general theory of competitive rationality. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, L., & Reeves, T. (1995). Human resource strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where do we need to go? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3), 656–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., & Wright, M. (2001). High-involvement work systems and performance outcomes: The strength of variable, contingent and context-bound relationships. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), 568–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrnrooth, M., & Björkman, I. (2012). An integrative HRM process theorization: Beyond signalling effects and mutual gains. Journal of Management Studies, 49(6), 1109–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., Morris, T., & O'Regan, P. (2015). How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms? Employee Relations, 37(2), 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gittell, J. H., Seidner, R., & Wimbush, J. (2009). A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organization Science, 21(2), 490–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, S. C., Elliott, C., & Quon, T. K. (2012). The relationship between learning capability and organizational performance. The Learning Organization, 19(2), 92–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V. K., & Batra, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in Indian SMEs: Universal and contingency perspectives. International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 660–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from new zealand. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J., Dietz, G., Marino, L., Kreiser, P., & Weaver, K. M. (2009). Measuring cross-natonal invariance of the entrepreneurial orientation scale. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(22), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S., & Alhakim, L. A. Y. (2011). The relationships among critical success factors of knowledge management, innovation and organizational performance: A conceptual framework. International Proceedings of Economics Development & Research.

  • Hayton, J. C. (2005). Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource management practices: A review of empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D., & Felfe, J. (2014). Effects of leadership style, creativity technique and personal initiative on employee creativity. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W. B., & Zhang, Y. L. (2011). New enterprises’ abilities to turn entrepreneurial orientation to performance: Theoretical model and Chinese empirical research. Nankai Business Review, 14(1), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Arnett, D. B. (2006). Does marketing success lead to market success? Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 820−828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J. H., Liu, C. J., & Jiang, T. Y. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational learning and corporate performance—Based on the moderating effect of measurement factors and contextual factors. Science Research Management, 35(8), 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, G. C., & Alavi, M. (2007). Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organization Science, 18(5), 796–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazanchi, S., & Masterson, S. S. (2011). Who and what is fair matters: A multi-foci social exchange model of creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 86–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., & Purcell, J. (2000). ‘Fun and surveillance’: The paradox of high commitment management in call centres. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(5), 967–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., & Weaver, K. M. (2002). Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: A multi-country analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 71–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., & Foss, N. J. (2003). New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Huang, Y. (2012). Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance. Management Decision, 50(6), 1096–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 615−640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. W., & Bang, H. (2012). High performance work systems, person-organization fit and organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Administration Research, 1(2), 129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Tan, J., & Liu, Y. (2010). Moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on market orientation-performance linkage: Evidence from Chinese small firms *. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1), 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S. H., & Wu, C. C. (2010). System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1096–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Links, M. M., Mihail, D. M., & Sarvanidis, S. (2013). High performance work systems in corporate turnaround: A German case study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(1), 190–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G., & Ko, W. W. (2012). Organizational learning and marketing capability development: A study of charity retailing operating of British social enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(4), 580–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxmi. (2014). Organizational learning act as a mediator between the relationship of knowledge management and organizational performance. Management & Labour Studies, 39(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino, L., Strandholm, K., Steensma, H. K., & Weaver, K. M. (2002). The moderating effect of national culture on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance portfolio extensiveness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messersmith, J. G., & Guthrie, J. P. (2010). High performance work systems in emergent organizations: Implications for firm performance. Human Resource Management, 49(2), 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messersmith, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2013). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance in young firms: The role of human resource management. International Small Business Journal, 31(2), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. D. (2007). Risk and rationality in entrepreneurial processes. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Schindehutte, M., & Laforge, R. W. (2002). Entrepreneurial marketing: A construct for integrating emerging entrepreneurship and marketing perspectives. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(4), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14−37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pak, J., & Kim, S. (2016). Team managers’ implementation, high performance work systems intensity, and performance: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Management, 0149206316646829.

  • Pearce, J. A. I., Fritz, D. A., & Davis, P. S. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of religious congregations as predicted by rational choice theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 219–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1996). When it comes to “best practices” — Why do smart organizations occasionally do dumb things? Organizational Dynamics, 25(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business Press.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posthuma, R. A., Campion, M. C., Masimova, M., & Campion, M. A. (2013). A high performance work practices taxonomy integrating the literature and directing future research. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1184–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, I. M., & Santana, M. P. P. (2012). Building ambidexterity: The role of human resource practices in the performance of firms from Spain. Human Resource Management, 51(2), 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runyan, R., Droge, C., & Swinney, J. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation versus small business orientation: What are their relationships to firm performance? Journal of Small Business Management, 46(4), 567–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanzo, M. J., Santos, M. L., Garcia, N., & Trespalacios, J. A. (2012). Trust as a moderator of the relationship between organizational learning and marketing capabilities: Evidence from Spanish SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 30(6), 700–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmelter, R., Mauer, R., Börsch, C., & Brettel, M. (2010). Boosting corporate entrepreneurship through HRM practices: Evidence from German SMEs. Human Resource Management, 49(4), 715–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, R. S. (1986). Fostering and facilitating entrepreneurship in organizations: Implications for organization structure and human resource management practices. Human Resource Management, 25(4), 607–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline. Measuring Business Excellence, 1(3), 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y., & Li, N. (2011). Research on high performance human resource practice: Theoretical review, analysis and future. Journal of Management Review, 23(10), 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D., & Konrad, A. M. (2017). Causality between high-performance work systems and organizational performance. Journal of Management, 43(4), 973–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, S., & Bohlander, G. W. (2010). Principles of human resource management. South-Western Cengage Learning.

  • Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extra-industry social capital. The Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Z. X. (2010). High performance human resource management system of Chinese enterprises in transitional period: An empirical study of localization. Nankai Business Review, 13(4), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D. P., Wang, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2007). An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J., Tang, Z., Marino, L. D., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2008). Exploring an inverted u-shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanos, I. C., Dimitratos, P., & Sapouna, P. (2016). The implications of international entrepreneurial orientation, politicization and hostility upon SME international performance. International Small Business Journal, 0266242616641749.

  • Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., Parida, V., & Kreiser, P. M. (2013). Nonlinear effects of entrepreneurial orientation on small firm performance: The moderating role of resource orchestration capabilities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(2), 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K. Y., Hermens, A., Huang, K. P., & Chelliah, J. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation and organizational learning on SMEs’ innovation. International Journal of Organizational Innovation.

  • Way, S. A., & Johnson, D. E. (2005). Theorizing about the impact of strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L. Q., & Lau, C. M. (2010). High performance work systems and performance: The role of adaptive capability. Human Relations, 63(10), 1487–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37−48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307−1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Z., & Björkman, I. (2006). High commitment work systems in Chinese organizations: A preliminary measure. Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean, J. W., & Lepak, D. P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 836–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (2015). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship - performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 10(1), 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. Y., Li, R. F., & Yao, Q. (2012). A meta-analysis between high performance system and corporate performance in Chinese context. Nankai Bus Rev, 15(3), 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, C. L., & Chen, X. L. (2014). High performance work systems and employee creativity: The mediating effect of knowledge sharing. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 8(3), 367–387.

    Google Scholar 


Page 2

  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy statement
  • Accessibility
  • Cookies

Follow SpringerOpen

  • SpringerOpen Twitter page
  • SpringerOpen Facebook page