The correct answer was given: Brain what: when quoting a source, use the author’s words verbatim, or word-for-word. this means you shouldn’t change any grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. put quotations around the words to tell your reader where the quote begins and where it ends. you also need to acknowledge the author. for example, if using mla format for your research paper, you should have in-text citations with the author’s name and page number listed at the end of each quote. when: use quotations to provide concrete examples to support your claims. using direct quotations is a great way to build your credibility on the subject. it’s also a good idea to quote your source when the author states things in a powerful way. if you think he or she said it best, then use the exact words to share the ideas. example: in the short story “a jury of her peers”, mrs. hale compares mrs. wright to her caged bird, saying “she—come to think of it, she was kind of like a bird herself. real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and—fluttery. how—she—did—change” (glaspell). paraphrasing what: paraphrasing differs from quoting because you restate the passage in your own words. since you don’t use the author’s words, you don’t need to use quotation marks. however, you still need to acknowledge the author for his or her ideas. when paraphrasing a text, you should communicate the full meaning of the text; don’t change the meaning. it can be a condensed version of the text, or it could end up being longer than the source it’s paraphrasing. when: you use paraphrasing when you take notes, or explain a chart or diagram to someone. paraphrasing highlight the important parts of a larger text. it also allows you to simplify the ideas for your readers. example: original: “it was no ordinary thing that called her away–it was probably further from ordinary than anything that had ever happened in dickson county. but what her eye took in was that her kitchen was in no shape for leaving: her bread all ready for mixing, half the flour sifted and half unsifted” (glaspell). paraphrase: as mrs. hales walks around mrs. wright’s home, she notices that the kitchen is in disarray as if she was in the middle of baking bread (glaspell). In another article, we explain direct objects. They’re the noun or noun phrase that receives the action of the verb. They answer the question of “who” or “what” is receiving the action of the verb. For example, “Marie brought cupcakes and iced tea.” Marie brought what? Cupcakes and iced tea. So, where do indirect objects fit into the equation? Truth is, they’re far less prevalent than direct objects, but they do serve a purpose. They’re the receivers of the direct object. That just got confusing, didn’t it? Fear not! The indirect objects examples below will make everything clear. Direct objects receive the action of the verb. Meanwhile, indirect objects receive the direct object. That’s all it boils down to. For example:
In this example, "James" is the subject. "Built" is the verb. James built what? (Don’t be tempted to think the direct object is Marie. James didn’t build Marie.) He built a tiny house. This is where indirect objects come in. Who’s receiving the tiny house? Marie is. Let’s outline a few more examples. We’ll put the direct objects in italics and the indirect objects in bold:
For an indirect object to exist, there must be a direct object. Direct objects only associate with transitive verbs. The definition of a transitive verb is an action verb that works with direct objects. So, they’re one big happy family. Indirect and direct objects will never follow linking verbs. These verbs do not show any action. Rather, their sole function is to link the subject of the sentence to further information. That further information is known as the subject complement. Common linking verbs include:
Notice none of these words convey any sort of action. That is where subject complements differ from direct objects - in the verb they’re following. However, there is a common denominator. Subject complements also answer the question “who” or “what.” Simply put, what you have to keep an eye out for is the verb in the sentence. Subject complements work hand in hand with linking verbs, while direct objects work hand in hand with transitive, or action, verbs. This is important because you never want to confuse indirect and direct objects for subject complements. Let’s look at three examples to illustrate this difference.
Indirect and direct objects provide added detail to our sentences. More than that, direct objects are required for many sentences to be complete. Indirect objects, however, are not. Remember Becky and her cookies? In one of our examples above, we said, “Becky baked Bernice a plateful of cookies.” We need the direct object, the "plateful of cookies," to finish the thought. But, we don’t necessarily need to specify they were for Bernice. It’s an added detail that may or may not be important. "Becky baked a plateful of cookies" makes perfect logical sense on its own. Interesting, right? Understanding the parts of a sentence will ensure you’re crafting cohesive and accurate thoughts. The best way to solidify your skills is to become a pro at diagramming sentences. It’s a fun way to deconstruct the words that flow from our hearts.
|