How has the sustainability movement changed organizations’ relations with their stakeholders?

• Anderson J, Markides C (2007) Strategic innovation at the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 49(1):83–88

  Google Scholar 

• Bansal P, Jiang GF, Jung JC (2015) Managing responsibly in tough economic times: strategic and tactical CSR during the 2008–2009 global recession. Long Range Plan 48(2):69–79

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management 17(1):99–120.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baron DP (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 10(1):7–45

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Benn S, Dunphy D, Griffiths A (2014) Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge, Oxford, UK

  Google Scholar 

• Berman SL, Wicks AC, Kotha S, Jones TM (1999) Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad Manag J 42(5):488–506

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Beschorner T (2014) Creating shared value: the one-trick pony approach. Business Ethics Journal Review 1(17):106–112

  Google Scholar 

• Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D, Sen S (2009) Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. J Bus Ethics 85(2):257–272

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bhattacharya CB, Sen S, Korschun D (2012) The stakeholder route to maximizing business and social value. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  Google Scholar 

• Brundtland GH (1987) Our common future: report of the 1987 world commission on environment and development. United Nations, Oslo

  Google Scholar 

• Burke L, Logsdon JM (1996) How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Plan 29(4):495–502

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Camilleri MA (2014) Advancing the sustainable tourism agenda through strategic CSR perspectives. Tourism Planning & Development 11(1):42–56

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Camilleri MA (2015) Valuing stakeholder engagement and sustainability reporting. Corp Reput Rev 18(3):210–222

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Camilleri MA (2017) Corporate sustainability, social responsibility and environmental management: an introduction to theory and practice with case studies. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Carroll AB (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manag Rev 4(4):497–505

  Google Scholar 

• Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons 34(4):39–48

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carroll AB (1998) The four faces of corporate citizenship. Bus Soc Rev 100(1):1–7

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carroll AB, Buchholtz, AK (2014). Business and society: ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Nelson Education

  Google Scholar 

• Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. Int J Manag Rev 12(1):85–105

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clarkson ME (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):92–117

  Google Scholar 

• Corazza L, Scagnelli SD, Mio C (2017) Simulacra and sustainability disclosure: analysis of the interpretative models of creating shared value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. In press.

  Google Scholar 

• Crane A, Palazzo G, Spence LJ, Matten D (2014) Contesting the value of “creating shared value”. Calif Manag Rev 56(2):130–153

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Davis K (1960) Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? Calif Manag Rev 2(3):70–76

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Bakker FG, Groenewegen P, Den Hond F (2005) A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society 44(3):283–317

  Article  Google Scholar 

• de los Reyes G, Scholz M, Smith NC (2016) Beyond the ‘win-win’: creating shared value requires ethical frameworks. California Management Review, Forthcoming. Forthcoming, INSEAD Working Paper No. 2016/67/ATL/Social Innovation Centre. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2848192

• Desai MA, Dharmapala D (2009) Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Rev Econ Stat 91(3):537–546

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Donaldson T, Preston LE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review 20(1):65–91.

  Google Scholar 

• Drucker PF (1984) Converting social problems into business opportunities: the new meaning of corporate social responsibility. Calif Manag Rev 26(2):53–63

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 11(2):130–141

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):57–74

  Google Scholar 

• Elkington J (1998) Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21stcentury business. Environ Qual Manag 8(1):37–51

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Elkington J (2012) Sustainability should not be consigned to history by Shared Value https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/sustainability-with-john-elkington/shared-value-johnelkington-sustainability

• European Union (2011) A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:en:PDF

• European Union (2016) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the EU. European Commission Publications, Brussels, Belgium http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=331

  Google Scholar 

• Falck O, Heblich S (2007) Corporate social responsibility: doing well by doing good. Business Horizons 50(3):247–254

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fombrun CJ (2005) A world of reputation research, analysis and thinking—building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: evolving standards. Corp Reput Rev 8(1):7–12

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fombrun CJ, Gardberg NA, Barnett ML (2000) Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Bus Soc Rev 105(1):85–106

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Freeman RE (1984) Stakeholder management: framework and philosophy. Pitman, Mansfield, MA. USA

  Google Scholar 

• Freeman RE, Harrison JS, Wicks AC, Parmar BL, De Colle S (2010) Stakeholder theory: the state of the art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine 13:32–33

  Google Scholar 

• Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Acad Manag Rev 30(4):777–798

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Godfrey PC, Merrill CB, Hansen JM (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strateg Manag J 30(4):425–445

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Griffin JJ, Mahon JF (1997) The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society 36(1):5–31

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Guenster N, Bauer R, Derwall J, Koedijk K (2011) The economic value of corporate ecoefficiency. European Financial Management 17(4):679–704

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gupta S, Sharma N (2009) CSR-A business opportunity. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations:396–401

• Harrison JS, Wicks AC (2013) Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Bus Ethics Q 23(1):97–124

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hemingway CA, Maclagan PW (2004) Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 50(1):33–44

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henisz WJ, Dorobantu S, Nartey LJ (2014) Spinning gold: the financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strateg Manag J 35(12):1727–1748

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?. Strategic management journal 125–39.

• Hull CE, Rothenberg S (2008) Firm performance: the interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strateg Manag J 29(7):781–789

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Husted BW, Allen DB (2009) Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation. Manag Int Rev 49(6):781–799

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Husted BW, Allen DB, Kock N (2015) Value creation through social strategy. Business & Society 54(2):147–186

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jamali D (2007) The case for strategic corporate social responsibility in developing countries. Bus Soc Rev 112(1):1–27

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnson RA, Greening DW (1999) The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Acad Manag J 42(5):564–576

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jones DA, Willness CR, Madey S (2014) Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Acad Manag J 57(2):383–404

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kotler P, Lee N (2008) Corporate social responsibility: doing the most good for your company and your cause. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA

  Google Scholar 

• Landrum NE (2007) Advancing the “base of the pyramid” debate. Strategic Management Review 1(1):1–12

  Google Scholar 

• Lantos GP (2001) The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. J Consum Mark 18(7):595–632

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lantos GP (2002) The ethicality of altruistic corporate social responsibility. J Consum Mark 19(3):205–232

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Levitt T (1958) The dangers of social-responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 36(5):41–50

  Google Scholar 

• Lindgreen A, Hingley MK, Grant DB, Morgan RE (2012) Value in business and industrial marketing: past, present, and future. Ind Mark Manag 41(1):207–214

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lozano R (2015) A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 22(1):32–44

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Maignan I, Ferrell OC, Hult GTM (1999) Corporate citizenship: cultural antecedents and business benefits. J Acad Mark Sci 27(4):455–469

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2001) People and profits?: the search for a link between a company's social and financial performance. Psychology Press, New York, NY, USA

  Google Scholar 

• Marques-Mendes A, Santos MJ (2016) Strategic CSR: an integrative model for analysis. Social Responsibility Journal 12(2):363–81.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Matten D, Crane A (2005) Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Acad Manag Rev 30(1):166–179

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26(1):117–127

  Google Scholar 

• McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright PM (2006) Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J Manag Stud 43(1):1–18

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Montiel I (2008) Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment 21(3):245–269

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Morsing M, Schultz M (2006) Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4):323–338

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murillo D, Lozano JM (2006) SMEs and CSR: an approach to CSR in their own words. J Bus Ethics 67(3):227–240

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Riordan L, Fairbrass J (2014) Managing CSR stakeholder engagement: a new conceptual framework. J Bus Ethics 125(1):121–145

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Olsen TD (2017) Political stakeholder theory: the state, legitimacy, and the ethics of microfinance in emerging economies. Bus Ethics Q 27(1)

• Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Orlitzky M, Siegel DS, Waldman DA (2011) Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business & society 50(1):6–27

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pava ML, Krausz J (1996) The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: the paradox of social cost. J Bus Ethics 15(3):321–357

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Porter ME (2001) The value chain and competitive advantage. Understanding business, Processes, pp 50–66

  Google Scholar 

• Porter ME, Kramer MR (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harv Bus Rev 80(12):56–68

  Google Scholar 

• Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006, Dec 2006) The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev:78–92

• Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) Creating shared value. Harv Bus Rev 89(1/2):62–77

  Google Scholar 

• Porter ME, Kramer MR (2014) A response to Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L.J. and Matten, D http://www.dirkmatten.com/Papers/C/Crane%20et%20al%202014%20in%20CMR.pdf

• Porter ME, Kramer M (2014) A response to Andrew Crane et al’.s article by Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L.J. & Matten, D. Contesting the value of “creating shared value" p. 20. http://www.dirkmatten.com/Papers/C/Crane%20et%20al%202014%20in%20CMR.pdf. Accessed 14 Sept 2017.

• Preston LE, O'bannon DP (1997) The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Business and society 36(4):419–429

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rasche A, De Bakker FG, Moon J (2013) Complete and partial organizing for corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 115(4):651–663

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salzmann O, Ionescu-Somers A, Steger U (2005) The business case for corporate sustainability:: literature review and research options. Eur Manag J 23(1): 27–36

• Sen S, Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D (2006) The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. J Acad Mark Sci 34(2):158–166

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shrivastava P (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):936–960

  Google Scholar 

• Singh J, Del Bosque IR (2008) Understanding corporate social responsibility and product perceptions in consumer markets: a cross-cultural evaluation. J Bus Ethics 80(3):597–611

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Steger U, Ionescu-Somers A, Salzmann O (2007) The economic foundations of corporate sustainability. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society 7(2):162–77.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Strand R (2014) Scandinavia can be an inspiration for creating shared value. Financial Times Business Education Soapbox. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/84bbd770-b34d-11e3-b09d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2zw0bVEbR

  Google Scholar 

• Strand R, Freeman RE, Hockerts K (2015) Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: an overview. J Bus Ethics 127(1):1–15

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Trejo SJ (1997) Why do Mexican Americans earn low wages? J Polit Econ 105(6):1235–1268

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad Manag J 40(3):658–672

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Marrewijk M (2003) Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. J Bus Ethics 44(2):95–105

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Marrewijk M, Werre M (2003) Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. J Bus Ethics 44(2):107–119

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Verbeke A, Tung V (2013) The future of stakeholder management theory: a temporal perspective. J Bus Ethics 112(3):529–543

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Visser W (2011) The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, west Sussex, U.K.

• Vogel DJ (2005) Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. Calif Manag Rev 47(4):19–45

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vogel DJ (2007) The market for virtue: the potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA

  Google Scholar 

• Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18(4):303–319

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Walton CC (1967) Corporate social responsibilities. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, USA

  Google Scholar 

• Wang H, Choi J (2013) A new look at the corporate social–financial performance relationship the moderating roles of temporal and interdomain consistency in corporate social performance. J Manag 39(2):416–441

  Google Scholar 

• Weber M (2008) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a company-level measurement approach for CSR. Eur Manag J 26(4):247–261

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wheeler D, Colbert B, Freeman RE (2003) Focusing on value: reconciling corporate social responsibility, sustainability and a stakeholder approach in a network world. J Gen Manag 28(3):1–28

  Google Scholar 

• Wheeler D, McKague K, Thomson J, Davies R, Medalye J, Prada M (2005) Creating sustainable local enterprise networks. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 47(1):33–40

  Google Scholar 

• Yasser QR, Al Mamun A, Ahmed I (2017) Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: insights from Asia Pacific. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. In press.

  Google Scholar 

Page 2