Why it is important to respect the views of minority?

Louis is confined to a wheelchair, Junior is gay, John is an albino. The three of them face discrimination. This feature series underlines the importance of treating people who are different with respect and tolerance.

Minorities are often pushed to the margins of society. They face prejudice because they are not the same as the majority of people around them. This series shows that people who look, think or behave differently have the right to be treated in the same way as every other human being. The series also shows how many minority groups have to fight hard to gain acceptance. One of those portrayed in the series is John, a talented singer and songwriter living in Zambia. John has written a love song which has made him famous throughout the country. The young musician is wildly beloved by his fans. These feelings of acceptance are new to him though; John is an albino and grew up in a village where he was ostracized by many people in the community. In spite of John's incredible success, other Albinos in Zambia still face discrimination and hostility. Junior, a young homosexual man, suffered from a similar stigma. He used to live in Kinshasa but because he constantly feared for his life, he immigrated to South Africa. Even in South Africa, said to be the most gay-friendly country in all of Africa, Junior still is not tolerated everywhere… The listeners also meet the Nigerian Lois who is confined to a wheelchair. Although she faces massive hurdles in her everyday life, Lois still finds the strength to encourage other disabled people to stand up for their rights. In the ten episodes, members of different minorities in Africa – and even Africans living abroad – talk about their lives, share their opinions and encourage listeners to treat them with respect.

Deutsche Welle’s Learning by Ear is available in six languages: English, Kiswahili, French, Hausa, Portuguese and Amharic.


a) The female teachers are in minority. It is important to respect the views of the female teachers because they are equally qualified males and equally contributing to run the school. (b) The Buddhists are in minority. The Buddhists are peace-loving people. Like other religious groups they have also the right to preserve and develop their own culture. Their views should be respected by non-Buddhists too. (c) The non-vegetarians are in minority. Unity in diversity is a part and parcel of the Indians, keeping this in mind, the non-vegetarians should be given equal weight because everyone has the right to food and diet according to his or her liking and taste.   (d) 20% students are poorer and therefore are in minority. The students belonging to well off families should behave well and honor the feeling of their poorer classmates.

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp  

Democracy is a way of government of the people which is ruled by the people. Democracies understand the importance of protecting the rights, cultural identities, social practices, and religious practices of all individuals. In order for the people’s will to govern, a system of majority rule with respect to minority rights has been put into place.

Majority rule is a way of organizing government where citizens freely make political decisions through voting for representatives. The representatives with the most votes then represent the will of the people through majority rule. Minority rights are rights that are guaranteed to everyone, even if they are not a part of the majority. These rights cannot be de eliminated by a majority vote. Minorities must trust that the majority will keep in mind the wishes of the minority when making decisions that affect everyone. The minority today will not necessarily be the minority of tomorrow.

The concept of majority rule and respect for minority rights is demonstrated in several places in the Constitution. The first three Articles in the Constitution identify how the people will elect representatives into the Congress and how those elected officials will then elect officials into the judicial and executive branches, thus giving direct and indirect representation to the majority. The articles also identify the duties of three separate branches of the government, the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. While each branch has its own duties; they are dependent on each other. It is the duty of the legislative branch to create a law. The judicial branch is responsible for interpreting that law and determining if it if Constitutional or not. The executive branch can veto the law, which then sends the legislative branch back to the drawing board. The above example not only shows how each branch is separate but related, it also shows how the different branches act as a check and balance system for one another. It is through the checks and balances system that the framers ensured that each branch would be fair and efficient.

The Constitution also demonstrates majority rule and respect for minority rights through Article V of the Constitution which explains that the Constitution can be amended in two ways. The first way is through the Congress passing a proposal, with a two-thirds vote, to the states to ratify. The amendment is ratified when approved by three-fourths of the states. The other way is through a national convention. This is where two-thirds of the states petition Congress to propose amendments. The proposal still has to receive a three-fourths vote by the states. This Article allows the people to make changes to the Constitution throughout time as the majority and minority positions change.

Two other places the Constitution addresses majority rule and minority rights are in Article VI of the Constitution and the First Amendment. Article VI ensures that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties take precedence over state laws. This Article binds all judges to abide to the same principles in court. This Article ensured that the majority rule of the nation trumped the majority will of the individual states. The First Amendment gives all citizens basic rights. It is through these rights that the minority stays protected. The right to free speech and the right to assemble allow the minority to be heard, which gives them the opportunity to grow and become the majority.

There are several instances in which the concept of majority rule with respect to minority rights has played a significant factor in American government and policy. One example is the case of Plessy v. Ferguson 1896. In this case Homer Plessy, a man who appeared white, but was one-eighth black, was arrested in Louisiana for sitting on the white railroad car and refusing to move to the black railroad car (Zimmerman, 1997). According to Louisiana law, all persons with a black blood line, regardless of how small, were to be considered black and must be segregated from the white people. After being released from prison, Plessy took his case to the US Supreme Court. The court decided that there could be segregation as long as long as it was of equal standards. This case demonstrates the will of the majority to allow for segregation as well as protecting the minority by requiring “equal standards”.

The next example of majority rule with respect to minority rights challenges the Plessy v. Ferguson decision in the case of Brown v. Board of Education Topeka, KS 1954. This historic case dismantled the segregation that was allowed in the Plessy case (Brown v. Board of Education). The Brown case involved 13 minority parents and their children who were denied access to a school closer to their home because of segregation laws. The case showed that the separate schools were in fact not equal. The case also showed that the segregation laws were a violation under the Equal Protection Clause. This case demonstrates how the minorities do have a voice, and the majority taking on their responsibility to also protect and serve the minority. This case was also the catalyst for social change in the United States towards the treatment of non-whites, this social change was the beginning of the minority becoming the majority.

Majority rule with respect to minority rights is vital to a democratic government. This process allows for citizens to maintain individual rights while following the direction of the majority. It also allows for the citizens to make changes to the laws as society, the majorities, and the minorities change.

Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp  

Minority rights, inclusion and equality play an important role in promoting political and social stability and peace. This has been recognized at the highest level of the UN and stated in the outcome document of the 2005 World Summit of Heads of State and Government, approved by the General Assembly. The implementation of law and policy relevant to inclusion and equality, and effective strategies for social cohesion, are therefore important goals which the Independent Expert is pursuing.

The Independent Expert recognizes that exclusion, discrimination and racism directed at minority groups may result in social unrest based on inequality. There is a need to better understand the causes and prevalence of discrimination against minorities in order to put in place effective policies and practices to address such situations, and avoid them. The Independent Expert consistently highlights to States the significant benefits of legislative and policy reform which seeks to promote effective strategies of social cohesion, equality and non-discrimination. She is mandated to identify possibilities for technical cooperation by the OHCHR to assist States in this respect. She also recognizes the need for mechanisms, including indicators, which allow deteriorating situations to be identified as early as possible in order to avoid grievances developing into violence, conflict or even genocide.

Minorities and the Discriminatory Denial or Deprivation of Citizenship



The Independent Expert consults with members and representatives of minority communities who reported experiencing denial and deprivation of citizenship during her visit to Dominican Republic in 2007
©

In the context of promoting social inclusion and ensuring stable societies, the Independent Expert has conducted thematic work on issues relating to the discriminatory denial or deprivation of citizenship as a tool for exclusion of national, ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities, which formed the thematic focus of her annual report to the 7th session of the Human Rights Council in March 2008. That work included convening an expert seminar on the subject in Geneva in December 2007. Minorities often face discrimination and exclusion, and they struggle to gain access to their human rights, even under conditions of full and unquestioned citizenship. Denying or stripping them of citizenship can be an effective method of compounding their vulnerability, and can even lead to mass expulsion. Once denied or deprived of citizenship, minorities are inevitably denied protection of their basic rights and freedoms, including minority rights as established in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities.

According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, close to 15 million people in more than 49 countries are stateless, and numbers appear to be increasing. Many minorities live in a precarious legal situation because, even though they may be entitled under law to citizenship in the State in which they live, they are often denied or deprived of that right and may in fact exist in a situation of statelessness. While many conditions give rise to the creation of statelessness, including protracted refugee situations and State succession, most stateless persons today are members of minority groups. The report of the Independent Expert provides a consideration of the global situation and elaborates a series of recommendations.

HRC 7th session - 2008

A/HRC/7/23

Report of the independent expert on minority issues, Gay McDougall – Minorities and the Discriminatory Denial or Deprivation of Citizenship

E F S A C R

Última postagem

Tag