Show
The RTO’s training and assessment strategies and practices, including the amount of training they provide, are consistent with the requirements of training packages and VET accredited courses and enable each learner to meet the requirements for each unit of competency or module in which they are enrolled. For the purposes of clause 1.1, the RTO determines the amount of training they provide to each learner with regard to: The RTO has, for all of its scope of registration, and consistent with its training and assessment strategies, sufficient: The RTO meets all requirements specified in the relevant training package or VET accredited course. The RTO:
Your RTO is required to develop and implement approaches—including by providing access to suitable resources, facilities and trainers—that ensure students gain all relevant skills and knowledge. The Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF) provides a guide to the volume of learning (see Tables 1 and 2), that describe how long a student who does not hold any of the competencies identified in the relevant units of competency or modules would take to develop all the required skills and knowledge. ‘Volume of learning’ includes all teaching, learning and assessment activities that a typical student must undertake to achieve the learning outcomes. Your RTO is required to comply with the AQF in applying the volume of learning to your programs. You must therefore develop and implement strategies for training and assessment that are consistent with the AQF. Table 1—Australian Qualifications Framework volume of learning : Certificate level
Table 2—Australian Qualifications Framework volume of learning: Diploma level
* Certificate III qualifications are often the basis for trade outcomes and undertaken as part of a traineeship or apprenticeship. In these cases, up to four years may be required to achieve the learning outcomes. ^ Certificate IV qualifications are often either:
Understanding the amount of training requiredThe AQF ‘volume of learning’ range is considered to be a starting point for RTOs determining the ‘amount of training’ required to deliver a particular qualification. In a competency-based training environment, which is centred on demonstrated competence against industry-defined standards of performance rather than strict course durations, students aren’t required to study for a specified number of weeks or months. Competency-based training is the concept that individuals learn at different rates as well as through different modes and different environments and that the skills and knowledge that a student has acquired previously are able to be formally recognised. However, your RTO must still be able to identify and explain any significant variations from the time periods described in the AQF. Your decisions in relation to course duration must ensure that the integrity of the qualification outcomes is maintained. If a course is structured so as to be completed in a shorter time period than that described in the AQF, you will need to clearly describe, using a rationale based on the needs of students and their previous skills and knowledge, how a specific student cohort:
Your description must take into account the need to allow students to reflect on and absorb the knowledge, to practise the skills in different contexts and to learn to apply the skills and knowledge in the varied environments that the ‘real world’ offers before being assessed. When might shorter courses be appropriate?A shorter course may be appropriate if, for example, the student cohort comprises experienced workers who already have most of the required skills and knowledge. Because these students have previous relevant experience, it may be appropriate to deliver and assess the program over a shorter period. Assessment requirements must still be met in such programs, although some assessment may be undertaken by recognising existing skills and knowledge. Be aware that in some cases where students have been employed long-term in an industry, their range of skills and knowledge may be narrow. They may not have the capacity to fully demonstrate these in a broader context or in different environments. Where the student cohort consists of new entrants or inexperienced workers, before assessment you must give them the opportunity to fully absorb the required knowledge, and to develop skills over time in the different contexts they would experience in the workplace. This may require a longer timeframe than for those students with significant industry experience. Educational and support services, resources and facilitiesRTOs must provide equitable access to all required educational and support services, so that no student is disadvantaged regardless of their mode of study or location. Make any limitations regarding access to these resources clear in your pre-enrolment information so clients and students can make an informed choice about which RTO and course of study best meets their needs. Your RTO must provide students with access to necessary resources, either by owning, leasing, or renting these resources, or by arranging for resources to be accessible to the students in another way. In the case of workplace delivery, many of the required resources may be readily available; however, some workplaces will not have access to all required resources and you will need to address any such gaps. Meeting training product requirementsTraining packages and VET accredited courses describe the requirements for assessment of students, including any specific environments or equipment that must be used. Assessment methods must ensure that only properly skilled students are determined as competent. When conducting assessment, adhere to all requirements such as the context of assessment and essential resources as described in the unit or module. When using ‘simulated’ workplace environments, ensure they fully replicate the resources, environment and any time and productivity pressures that exist in the actual workplace. It is important to ensure the development and use of simulated environments is informed by consultation with industry stakeholders. This helps to ensure relevance to real workplaces. You must, at all times, have all resources available to deliver every training product on your RTO’s scope of registration—whether you are currently delivering it or not. These resources must comply with any specific requirements in the training package or accredited course. The quantity of these resources required will depend on how many students you are delivering to (or intend to deliver to). Your training and assessment strategies should include guidance on the level of resources needed per student or per group. Monitoring, evaluation and continuous improvement of training and assessment strategies and practicesYour RTO is responsible for developing, implementing, monitoring and evaluating quality training and assessment strategies and practices that meet training package and VET accredited course requirements. Systematic monitoring of internal systems, strategies and practices allows your RTO to respond quickly to changes in the marketplace or to stakeholder expectations. Use the outcomes of your reviews to decide whether changes to your strategies or practice are needed. Reviews should include any arrangements where services are provided by a third party, as your RTO is ultimately responsible for the quality and compliance of all services provided under its RTO registration, regardless of where or by whom they are delivered. An RTO cannot use a third party arrangement to avoid responsibility for compliance with the NVR Act or the Standards for RTOs and is wholly responsible for all services provided on its behalf. A guide to complianceASQA’s regulatory experience and strategic industry reviews indicate that RTOs are most frequently non-compliant with Standard 1. Most commonly, ASQA finds that:
ASQA’s strategic reviews have found significant evidence of ‘unduly short training’—courses that are delivered in significantly shorter timeframes than those required to ensure students gain the competencies specified in the training. Specifically, the reviews have found course durations falling significantly below the relevant AQF volume of learning range without a rationale related to the student characteristics, calling into question whether students have sufficient time to learn, practice and consolidate the skills and knowledge before summative assessment. This poses substantial risks to the entire VET system and potentially has major financial, safety and productivity costs for individual students, employers and industry and governments. Your RTO must develop a strategy for training and assessment for each training product you are registered to deliver. The format for these strategies can be determined by the RTO. You may need to develop different strategies for different delivery modes or target groups/student cohorts. A training and assessment strategy may comprise multiple documents; however, there must be consistency between these documents so that the overall strategy is clearly described. Your strategies for training and assessment should not be ‘static’. Each strategy needs to be regularly updated to take into account:
The strategies must also be consistent with any advertising and other material you provide to prospective students. You may set specific requirements, such as requiring students to have a minimum period of industry experience before they can commence the program. If you set these requirements, you must make this clear to prospective students prior to enrolment. In relation to monitoring and evaluating your training and assessment strategies and practices, while each RTO can decide on its own process, you need to keep evidence to show that:
Components of training and assessment strategiesRTOs should address, at minimum, the following areas in each strategy. Training product
Core and elective components (full qualifications)
Target group
Mode of delivery
Entry requirements
Duration and scheduling
Assessment resources, methods and timing
Learning resources
Human resources
Physical resources
Strategies for ‘stand-alone’ single units or skill sets
Strategies for assessment-only pathwaysWhere your RTO offers an assessment-only pathway, develop and implement strategies that cover:
How can my RTO demonstrate and provide evidence of compliant practice?Your training and assessment practices must demonstrate that students gain all the knowledge and skills relevant to their qualification. At performance assessment (audit), when looking at evidence relating to the training and assessment phase of the student journey, ASQA will focus on past and current practices. Your systems and procedures are relevant, but are not sufficient evidence to demonstrate compliance. Once you are confident that your training and assessment strategies are compliant with the Standards, you need to ensure that your training and assessment practice aligns with your strategies. In order to gather evidence of compliant practice you might ask yourself a number of key questions, for example:
You must retain evidence that your RTO’s practices match the outcomes of your reviews. If a review confirms the RTO is doing well, you may not need to change your RTO’s systems or processes. However, if a review indicates a need for change, your RTO should retain evidence that the change has been implemented, or note the rationale for why a change was not made. You could retain evidence that the review process has considered, for example:
Examples of how you could demonstrate that improvements have been made to training and assessment as a result of monitoring and evaluation include providing evidence of:
|