HTS 64(2) 2008 959
Application and adaptation of
Symphonology Bioethical Theory (SBT)
in pastoral care practice
M M Khechane
Department of Practical Theology
University of South Africa
Abstract
In an environment which is ethically and from a human rights point
of view overly sensitive and in which interculturism is becoming
more and more a norm, pastoral care practitioners need to be
committed to providing services that are ethical, intercultural and
respecting. patients’ rights. This article demonstrates how
application of the Symphonology Bioethical Theory (SBT) as the
framework for practice in pastoral care and counselling can help
Pastoral Care Practitioners (PCP) to be ethical while upholding
patients’ human rights, and it can also help to bridge the
intercultural chasm while simultaneously explaining the rationale for
the practice. Symphonology is a context-driven, ethical decision-
making model guiding holistic interaction between patients and
PCPs. The Symphonological decision-making matrix is based on a
practitioner-patient agreement for pastoral care that emphasizes
patient preferences, pastoral psychological and theological
knowledge, the pastoral care content and the context of the
situation. The goal of the PCP is to ethically incarnate the divine
presence and thus to bring about hope and emancipation to the
patient using the bioethical standards of autonomy, freedom,
objectivity, self-assertion, benevolence and fidelity.
1. INTRODUCTION
“Can the two walk (work) together unless they are in agreement?” (Am 3:3,
paraphrased). Implicit in this question, is that for people to work together
effectively, they need to have an agreement (Latin symphonia) as the
foundation for their collaboration to succeed. This article explores the nature
of agreements in pastoral care and counselling between a pastoral care
Application and adaptation of Symphonology Bioethical Theory
960 HTS 64(2) 2008
practitioner (PCP)
1
and a patient/counselee in diverse clinical settings. In a
PCP-patient relationship, how can an agreement that is ethical and patient
rights-respecting be established? Agreement is often taken for granted in
such relationships; although many approaches to pastoral care and
counselling have been proposed and studied, the SBT has yet to be applied to
pastoral care and counselling. A lack of clear guidelines, expectations and
understanding relating to the cause of action to be taken often leads to the
trumping of patients’ human rights. Whereas professional bodies such as the
American Association of Pastoral Counsellors (AAPC) and the Association of
Professional Chaplains (APC)
2
have general professional ethical guidelines
regulating the professional conduct of their respective professionals, they
often lack the necessary specification.
While I contend that the Symphonology Bioethical Theory (SBT)
provides this necessary specification in specific pastoral care practitioner-
patient/counselee encounters, I also argue that by relating to the patient
through the SBT approach, the PCP would be acting not only as an effective
agent for both a patient and God, but can also bring respect and an ethical
dimension into the PCP-patient/counselee relationship. The SBT approach
encapsulates not only what the pastoral care is about, namely living out one’s
faith in the midst and context of the other’s pain and suffering. It also
prescribes what is necessary in forming an agreement to enter into such a
relationship where a PCP participates in another’s subjective world of pain
and suffering. It further rids pastoral care practice of overly paternalistic
stance.
PCPs are often called upon to help patients and families in making life
and death decisions. This is because they are perceived to be not only God’s
representatives, but also to be closer to God; and therefore the perception is
that God heeds their prayers more than those of other people.
3
Unfortunately,
this perception may give some PCPs the impression that they have a special
1
While a distinction is often made between pastoral care and pastoral counselling, PCP as
used here incorporates functions of both; pastoral counselling is a dimension of pastoral care.
PCP is further understood here as an umbrella term for religious oriented health care
professionals offering spiritual counselling and support in a professional clinical setting. The
term therefore covers duly trained chaplains, clergy and others so trained.
2
I am formally a certified member of the APC as BCC (Board Certified Chaplain); also see
www.professionalchaplains.org for such ethical guidelines.
3
See for example the North Carolina Army National Guard recruitment promotional advert
which reads: “… Chaplain corps bringing God closer to the soldier and the soldier closer to
God”, available at //www.nc.ngb.army.mil/recruiting/documents/ChaplainFlyer.doc,
(accessed 16 May, 2007); see also See Sarah Funke “God’s representatives: a new look at
imago Dei” available at //www.bagpipeonline.com/index.php?path=/archives/000200.php,
(accessed 16 May, 2007).
M M Khechane
HTS 64(2) 2008 961
and unique access to God. As a result, they may misapply themselves by
reinforcing this perception in the manner and attitude in which they relate to
patients.
4
Biblically and ontologically, they do not occupy any place of
significance better than that of a patient, for we are all equally made in the
image and likeness of one God.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
The Symphonology Bioethical Theory was developed by Husted and Husted
(2001), particularly for application in nursing. Although the theory is steadily
gaining ascendancy and currency in nursing, it has yet to make inroads into
other related disciplines such as pastoral care and counselling. There are
however, a number of works worth mentioning, that, although not addressing
the SBT, will nevertheless help elucidate this subject. These, among others,
include Patton (2005), Sperry (2001), Purves (2004) and Lynch (1999). All
these books address the pastoral relationship in some way. Patton puts more
emphasis on the “pastoral presence” and its many shades. In addition, many
authors on narrative approaches have restored “patients’ voices.” All these
authors, however, have one thing in common: they do not address the topic of
concern in this article: agreement in pastoral care and counselling.
3. SYMPHONOLOGY BIOETHICAL THEORY
The key word in defining Symphonology Bioethical Theory is agreement.
Husted and Husted (2001:xviii) define symphonology (from the Greek word,
symphonia, meaning agreement) as:
the study of agreements in the health care arena between health
care professionals and patients. It is a study of the ethical
implications of the health care professional/patient agreement … [it]
is … a practice-based ethic appropriate to people practicing as
professionals. It is a set of standards of behaviour, preconditions
necessary to agreement and professional interaction, requiring
contextual understanding and application for ideal interactions in
the health care setting.
3.1 The basis for Symphonology Bioethical Theory
Symphonology is based on the supposition that, for a proper human progress
and collaboration, agreement must exist between all rational beings.
4
Incidentally, the terms “patience” and “patient” are both derived from the Latin word that
means to suffer or to endure and from which the term “compassion” is also derived (Patridge
1966:475). As such, by extension, all PCPs are also patients. A PCP self-knowledge as a
patient “helps generate compassion and patience” (Patton 2005:62).
Application and adaptation of Symphonology Bioethical Theory
962 HTS 64(2) 2008
Symphonology is a system of interpersonal ethics based on the
terms and preconditions of an agreement. In the health care setting
this is the agreement that establishes the nature of the relationship
between a patient and a health care practitioner (such as PCP).
Ethical and professional responsibilities are set by this relationship.
Ethical responsibilities centre on the situation of a patient, a
professional’s understanding of the demands of effective inter-
action, and the nature of the human values a professional can bring
to their relationship.
(Husted & Husted 2001).
SBT establishes a perspective from which both a professional and a patient
can perceive and understand each other and direct the manner in which they
interact with each other. Ethical decisions in health care profoundly affect the
lives of people and as such SBT has certain principles, called bioethical
standards, that structure, guide and define the professional-patient
agreement. There are six such principles or standards:
• autonomy
• freedom
• objectivity
• self-assertion
• beneficence and
• fidelity
The adapted symphonological decision-making matrix is based on a PCP-
patient agreement that emphasises patient preferences, PCP knowledge and
the context of the situation, constructs that are integral to evidence-based
practice. This is anchored by the content of pastoral care (the reality of God:
the story of His involvement with us and the reality of humanity: the story of a
personal history which all meet in the pastoral care situation (De Jongh van
Arkel 2000:40).
3.2 The rationale for Symphonology Bioethical Theory in pastoral
care
At least three rationales for the application of the SBT in pastoral care
profession are advanced. Firstly, daily life demands major choices and
decisions in general, but in particular, in a clinical setting, choices and
M M Khechane
HTS 64(2) 2008 963
decisions are often matters of life and death. Agreements (symphoniae,
singular: symphonia) must be foundational to these choices and decisions.
Secondly, the SBT could serve as the pastoral care framework for situating
pastoral care practice within the framework of bioethical standards. In the
South African and the African context, where professional pastoral ministry
has, for many years, been dominated by Western ideologies and views of the
other, in which the other is often conceived both as inferior and different, the
SBT serves as a corrective orientation that not only restores human dignity
but also elevates the other to the same level. Thirdly, the SBT standards can
serve to operationalise the “cultural engagement”
5
approach, especially in
diverse cultural situations. “Engagement” is the key here; it is a reciprocal
process of communication and dialogue in which one individual’s values and
expectations, especially regarding health and religious beliefs are freely made
explicit to the other individual, thus promoting common understanding.
Geertz (1973:89) describes culture as “a historically transmitted pattern
of meanings embodied in symbols … by means of which men (sic)
communicate, perpetuate, and develop their knowledge about and attitudes
toward life.” Although ideally both the PCP and the patient should understand
each other’s culture, with the proper application of the SBT standards, the
PCP will be exhibiting cultural understanding skills.
4. EXPLICATION OF A PASTORAL CARE PRACTITIONER
A PCP could be defined as both an agent and a catalyst. She/he is an agent
of both God and a patient at the same time. As a patient’s agent, a PCP
represents the desires and the yearnings of a patient to God and, in a limited
sense, to the community as well; she/he attends primarily to the spiritual well
being of a patient, and attempts to walk alongside the patient, helping the
patient to reconnect with the divine. She/he is a “spiritual healer
6
.” When a
believer is well, the locus of the believer’s encounter with God are often the
scriptures, sacraments, church attendance, et cetera. Upon becoming a
patient, a believer may no longer be able to do and participate in these things
and one’s perception of encounter with God is disrupted as one begins to
question the role of God in all this. During the time of extended illness and
suffering, some people’s faith in the God who heals is radically challenged;
they vacillate between believing in the healing God and the God who may not
5
For a definition of cultural engagement, see Michele Carter and Graig Klugman’s (2001)
“Cultural engagement in clinical ethics: A model for ethics consultation” Cambridge Quarterly
of Healthcare Ethics, 10:16-33.
6
Spiritual healing, as envisioned here, differs from the usage by the Christian science; as
used here, it focuses on a deeper meaning of illness and/or suffering and how a patient can
work/exist within that meaning. In reality only God can heal, but a PCP, as a spiritual healer
creates a mutual context in which healing can take place.
Application and adaptation of Symphonology Bioethical Theory
964 HTS 64(2) 2008
be so healing. This could lead to resorting to some deistic worldview of God,
in which God is indifferent to one’s pain and suffering and/or to a Deus
absconditus understanding, where God is understood to be hidden and
unapproachable. This is where a PCP comes in. A patient, whose locus of
encounter with God has been shattered either by a serious illness or by his or
her perception thereof, shifts his or her locus of encounter with God to God’s
agent, the PCP. Incidentally, when this shift happens, the first steps of the
PCP-patient agreement take place. PCPs must be acutely aware of their role
and responsibilities. One of the key roles a PCP may be called to perform may
be that of a spiritual healer.
There are at least three essential conditions a spiritual healer must
meet, two of which Nouwen (1979) identifies. First, is the ability to “recognise
his sufferings in his own heart” and the second condition is compassionate
empathy (vicarious introspection), which is the capacity to think and feel
oneself into the inner life of another person. The third condition is that a PCP
be a person devoted to personal prayer and study. Here, in prayer and study,
is where the PCP is rejuvenated, refreshed and kept abreast of the latest
trends in the profession.
The work of a PCP is possible, because there is an assumption that
there is a relationship between the metaphysical world and physical existential
realities, as well as between health and spirituality. Therefore a PCP fits well
in the modern health care setting as a member of the interdisciplinary team.
However, a PCP is unlike any other health care professional in several ways.
Concerning other health care professionals, such as nurses, physiotherapists
et cetera, there is tacit expectation from patients to be visited by such
professionals. Generally, there tend to be no such expectation from patients
that a PCP should visit them; when people are admitted to the hospital, they
are primarily admitted for some physical condition and not a spiritual
condition. Further, unlike other professionals, a PCP’s relationship with
patients is distinctively characterised by the “I – Thou” relationship, as well as
being (the ministry of presence) rather than doing. This means that a PCP-
patient relationship is uniquely relational and representative – a PCP
represents the God who is always present to comfort, especially, in times of
sorrow, pain and difficulty. Patton (2005:25) writes:
The presence a PCP offers is more than his presence. He is a
reminder and representer of God, faith, the church, and all that
religion may represent to the person cared for … the carer is a part
M M Khechane
HTS 64(2) 2008 965
of bringing that presence into some kind of awareness in the person
cared for and in himself.
7
The focus of the PCP’s work as a health care practitioner therefore has to be
on how to be in relation to a patient. What does it mean to be in an authentic
professional and ethical relationship with a patient?
5. TOWARD A PASTORAL THEOLOGY OF RELATION-
SHIPS
Patients often vacillate between the two poles of despair and hope. They exist
– and their stories are wrapped – in temporality. Lester (1995) observes that
pastoral theology must begin its study of hope and despair on the
anthropology cornerstone of human temporality. When people are distressed,
they often vacillate between these two poles and more so toward the pole of
despair. One of the resources that a PCP has, is the ability to assist sufferers
in recovering their own locus of hope. This is done by pointing them to the
connectivity of the three dimensions of time-consciousness; their past stories
(which may or may not be the basis for either their hoping or despairing
process), their present stories (which, based on the past stories, may
precipitate the present story in view of the future story). Pastoral theology
understands hope as:
... rooted in the past because we remember the mighty acts of God
and our personal encounters with the transcendent. Hope is
empowered from the future where it receives its vision. Finally,
hope is active in the present as it energises and motivates us to live
so that God’s “will be done on earth as it is in heaven”.
(Lester 1995:22)
5.1 Theology of relationships
In this article, symphonology theory is located within a larger theology of
relationships. According to Dayringer (1998:22), “… a theology of relationship
(embedded in human story in temporality: past-present-future) assumes that
life is a process of achieving identities that sustain and move each person
toward true fulfilment.” This theology of relationship finds its best expression in
the person and ministry of Jesus the Christ. “Religion was to Christ a matter of
7
For extended discussion of the dimensions of the pastoral presence see Patton (2005:28-
30).
Application and adaptation of Symphonology Bioethical Theory
966 HTS 64(2) 2008
active relationship” (Dayringer 1998:28). Christ summed up all Scripture in
terms of relationship when he said, “love the Lord your God … (Mt 22:37-40).
Also, the parable trilogy (lost coin, sheep and son) in Luke 15 emphasises a
restoration of broken relationships. The attitude and stance of Christ in this
trilogy are important and exemplary. His role was not to blame, but to extend
restoring grace in spite of carelessness (sheep), accident (coin) or poor
choice (son). The conventional “wisdom” would blame other people or
circumstances – or condemn the son for having made a wrong choice in the
first place. Christ is saying “a new law I give you is this: ‘care for the lost and
extend grace to them in the spirit of acceptance and non-judgemental.’” The
theology of relationship is by definition a theology of care.
5.1.1 The relational nature and role of pastoral care
8
Stewart (1970:37) sees the concept of “role” as central in the counselling
relationship; he defines it as “an interpersonal relationship within a social
system …” In the context of the PCP-patient relationship, role expectations
are those that both a PCP and a patient place on each other. A patient’s
expectations of the “pastoral role” are often different from the PCP’s own role
expectations. PCP’s expectations of the patient’s role are also different from
the patient’s own role expectations. Expectations emanate from one’s own
desires and fears. As such, it is important to understand the important role
these two human motivations (desires and fears) play in framing and shaping
human future stories.
Conventionally, society has a certain prism through which it views and
understands a patient’s role, especially if hospitalised. Society tends to see a
patient as someone who is weak, vulnerable, (temporarily) not normal,
passive, incapable of making sound decisions, and the like. An SBT oriented
PCP may empower a “patient” by modelling an egalitarian “I-Though” (Buber
1958) relationship with the patient.
In order for there to be a meaningful collaborative progress, as
structured by the SBT standards, between a patient and a PCP, there must be
a shared understanding of each other’s role expectations. Expectations and
roles would therefore need to be clarified. The first step toward improving and
enriching the feelings which human beings have for each other, is to clarify
the roles that each plays or ascribes to the other (Levy 1938:65). The basic
premise of the SBT provides a better model for this, because it goes far
beyond just understanding between the two – it seeks agreement between the
two. This agreement is predicated upon the bioethical standards which serve
as preconditions of agreement. However, as important as agreement is, it has
8
For an expanded discussion of pastoral roles, among others, see Richard Dayringer (1998).
M M Khechane
HTS 64(2) 2008 967
to be anchored by one’s socio-theological anthropology. This is where a PCP
can draw deep from both Christian and appropriate socio-cultural resources.
For Christians, one such a resource is the emulation of Christ’s view of people
as well as an appropriation of the biblical notion of the imago Dei. This aught
to command not only respect and affinity for human persons, but also a
genuine sense of positive regard. Christ displayed this model.
PCPs are individuals who have undergone formal training in helping
relationships (psychology & counselling) and theology; however, what makes
one a PCP, in the first instance, is not his/her training but his/her role and
calling (the authority and mandate referred to below). PCPs roles entail
visiting and comforting the sick and the distressed. Their calling, in the
Christian tradition, arises from two related motifs: imitatio Dei / Christi
(imitating God/Christ) and the imago Dei (image of God) and is rooted in the
crucifixion and resurrection of the Christ (a hope-giving event). The Christ
event reminds us to go and be with those in distress – just like Christ who
came and immersed himself in human experience, becoming fully human
while remaining fully God (healthy balance of attachment and detachment at
the same time). In this way a PCP is reminded to fully immerse him- or herself
in the lives of those who may be going through, and experiencing, a difficult
phase in their lives, while at the same time maintaining a healthy balance of
attachment-detachment (as Christ did).
The crucifixion reminds a despairing and suffering person that God
embraced suffering as a reality of human existence and condition. On the
cross, rejection, loneliness, anguish, failure, pain, betrayal, and dashed
dreams are all taken up by the suffering God (Lester 1997:87). Although
suffering is a reality of human condition, “the cross reminds us of another
reality within this sacred story, God is with us. God is present with us in our
deepest suffering, understanding and sharing our pain” (Lester 1997:87).
Incidentally, this immersion in human experience, pain and sorrow finds its
impulse in the imago Dei. Imago Dei implies that there is an ontological
relatedness between humankind and God, which further implies care and
concern for those made in God’s image. The imitation motif teaches the PCP
how to be and act toward those in pain and are suffering: comfort and weep
with those who weep (cf Rm 12:15) and be a soothing and non-judgmental
presence to them.
Pastoral care practice, like other professions, has certain premises. It
affirms the reality of pain and suffering in the world and, as such, one
dimension of pastoral care is to encourage the patient to stay in touch with
this reality. Another premise is that each person has a sacred story that
includes his or her ultimate belief about the future. According to Lester
Application and adaptation of Symphonology Bioethical Theory
968 HTS 64(2) 2008
(1997:151): “The loss or disruption of these future stories in the past can be a
major cause of problems in the present.” As a representer of God to patients,
a PCP functions as a catalyst, enabling patients to include hopeful sacred
stories in their confrontation with the crisis, illness and any other problems that
they face and thus mediating the awareness of God (or the divine) and
creating a healing context in patients’ situation. The PCP represents the
reality of hope in the face of suffering (Lester 1997:88).
Imitation of God (imitatio Dei motif): Just as God visits (cf Gn 18:1),
comforts and heals the sick (cf Lv 16:1) and thus bringing peace, comfort and
hope to them in times of distress and despair, a PCP is called to do likewise.
That is, to bring comfort, peace and hope to patients and their families. The
understanding that each person is a carrier of God’s image means that each
person has inherent worth and value and as such, any interaction with the
patient is by definition sacred. The foundation of the interaction has to be
based on mutual respect between a patient and a PCP irrespective of each
other’s philosophical or religious viewpoints but respective of each other’s
humanity as a carrier of God’s image and likeness.
The imitation motif orients one’s calling primarily on being like God and
only secondarily on doing like God for at least two reasons. Firstly it is
because “while people across denominational lines are interested in the
minister’s skill at performing (doing) tasks, they are also highly sensitive to the
character (being) of the minister” (Gula 1996:32) and secondly it is because
“in Biblical parlance, the individual only becomes a self by allowing the divine
Other to ‘summon’ or ‘call’ it to its responsibilities for the human other”
(Hermans, Immink, De Jong & Van der Lans 2002:93). For Gergen
(1991:157), “the self is … a product of its various relationships, not a pre-
existing interior reality.”
This understanding necessarily means that PCPs begin their
professional journey by focusing first on themselves (in an effort
9
to be like
God), asking God to enable them to be worthy God re-presenters. Being a
representer of God entails a number of things, including having compassion,
love and true desire to visit and comfort the sick. Husteds and Husteds note
that “While (for SBT) optimum care for a patient is indispensable, even central
to a professional bioethics, (the SBT) concentrates on the welfare of the
health care professional ... which is also central to the well-being and welfare
of patients.”
10
In this sense SBT resonates with the clinical pastoral paradigm
9
It is an effort because, although enabled by God’s Spirit, it takes personal work, in terms of
Christian disciplines and cultivation of Christian virtues, to become more like Christ.
10
Husted & Husted’s Symphonology Bioethical Theory at
//www.nursing.duq.edu/faculty/husted/bioethical/details.html accessed Feb 06 2007.
M M Khechane
HTS 64(2) 2008 969
(Patton 1993) in which emphasis on the person giving care lies in being,
knowing and doing of the PCP. This is what Patton (1993:4) calls “pastoral
wisdom … which includes academic knowledge. Much of it is knowledge
gained through the actual practice of ministry and reflection on that practice”
(emphasis added).
The term “pastor” is both a relational communal term; to be “pastoral” is
to be relational and in community. To be in a relationship already assumes
permission and agreement of some sort between the parties in a relationship,
a PCP-patient relationship is hardly possible without permission and
agreement. For a PCP, a pastoral symphonological ethic is an ethic based on
patient’s purposes as codified in PCP-patient agreement, grounded in PCP-
God agreement, and guided by the PCP-community-patient agreement.
Properly understood and applied in pastoral care, SBT gives meaning and
structure to this tripartite agreement. It answers the question, “how can a PCP
be in relation with the patient, the community (this includes both the
practitioner and or religious or civil communities) and God for the benefit of a
particular patient?”
5.1.2 The mandate and authority of the pastoral care practitioner
The mandate and authority of the PCP can be understood as flowing in three
directions; it can be located in God who calls; in the community of faith which
commissions; and the health care institution within which the PCP operates.
Primarily, one serving as a PCP would have a sense of calling and anointing
and can legitimately, proclaim jointly with Christ:
The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because He hath anointed me to
preach the gospel to the poor; He hath sent me to heal the broken-
hearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of
sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, to preach
the acceptable year of the Lord.
(Luke 4:18)
This is the first-order mandate and authority – located in God. The second-
order mandate and authority comes from the community that recognised and
confirmed the first-order authority and mandate by ordaining and
commissioning such a PCP. It also comes from the institution that hired the
PCP.
Application and adaptation of Symphonology Bioethical Theory
970 HTS 64(2) 2008
6. PASTORAL CARE AND THE SYMPHONOLOGICAL
ETHIC
Like a nurse who “ought to examine her life … to the point where she comes
to an agreement with herself that she will be a nurse” (Husted & Husted
2001:54), a PCP as well has to come to an agreement with him/herself that
he/she will be a PCP. However, unlike a nurse who has an agreement with
herself as the starting point, the PCP has at least four-directional agreement:
with God, community, self and a patient. The PCP agreement with God is
foundational to the other agreements.
6.1 PCP/God agreement
In the foundational agreement, a PCP-God agreement, a PCP is called to be
a “co-labourer with God” (cf 1 Cor 3:8) in which he/she lays down his/her
desire to God – a desire to be a spiritual healer, a comforter, reconciler,
sustainer and a guide. A PCP enters, as it were, into a covenantal agreement
with God that he/she will first imitate God (imatatio Dei) by nurturing,
comforting, and tending “God’s flock”, (the sick, the suffering and the
distressed) with all the Christians spiritual resources. This agreement implies
that PCPs will make it their goal to acquire all the resources necessary to
achieve this desire. In practical terms, this means the formal training a PCP
will have to have undergone (theology and programmes such as the Clinical
Pastoral Education) in a relevant community context. However, the fact that a
PCP enters into this agreement with God does not give him/her (a PCP) an
automatic permission to enter into an agreement with the patient. This has to
be negotiated.
6.2 PCP/patient agreement
The getting together of a PCP and a patient already presupposes the
presence of God because “wherever two or three are gathered in my name, I
am in their midst” (Mt 18:20). This implies equal standing for both a PCP and
a patient because the quoted Scripture says “wherever two or three are
gathered in my name, and NOT when a pastor or PCP is present then, I am
their midst.” The getting together of God’s people, irrespective of their status,
invokes the presence of God. “An agreement is a shared state of awareness
on the basis of which interaction occurs” (Husted & Husted 2001:61) between
two or more people in which neither is forced nor deceived; it “is a process in
which two conscious beings create a resolution between them that becomes
their strategy for action” (Husted & Husted 2001:79). The mutual
understanding between the PCP and the patient is that the patient is only in
the health care setting so that he or she will be able “to return to optimal
M M Khechane
HTS 64(2) 2008 971
health”. In a PCP-patient agreement, an objective agreement is begun the
moment a PCP introduces him- or herself as such and it is further explicated
when the patient divulges any sacred story to the PCP. Objective agreement
means that both the PCP and the patient are aware of the reasons for the
agreement. Why are they both there in the first place? The patient is in pain
and may be suffering and therefore in need of reassurance and hope; the
primary reason for the PCP’s visit/presence is to represent divine presence
and grace; thereby bringing hope and reassurance to a patient at hand.
When a patient is conscious and communicative it is clear how an
objective agreement – through the bioethical standards – is established
between a PCP and a patient. When the patient is non-conscious/
communicative – and does not have a proxy – it is not clear how such
agreement is established. The solution to this, is that when a patient comes to
the hospital, he/she is in fact saying to the hospital (of which the PCP is a
member): “You are a custodian of my trust as far as my health is concerned.”
In turn, the hospital has already said – by mere existing as such: “Yes, we will
be custodian of your trust (fiduciary).”
The PCP is in a unique position to explore (if invited), the deep sources
of patients’ values, often embedded in their sacred stories, and to help or
guide them to produce decisions that will be spiritually and ethically satisfying.
“Part of our responsibility includes firstly helping the patient locate reality ….
Pastoral care helps people evaluate how the future stories within their core
narratives are connected with reality” (Lester 1995:88). Secondly, enabling the
patient to uncover these sacred stories about sickness, death or any crises, to
help him or her find the resources in his or her own sacred story (Lester
1995:93).
6.3 PCP-community agreement
Although it is true, that “every person who enters the health care system …
enters as an ethical individualist” (Husted & Husted 2001:30), such a person
exists and lives in relation to others (a community, religious or civil). Personal
choices of individuals have an impact on members of their communities,
whether it is directly or indirectly. It is therefore important that individual
personal choices, at times, be considered within a larger community context.
This is beneficial not only to the community but to the individual concerned as
well. The PCP-community agreement is only adjunct to the PCP-patient
agreement – while the PCP-God agreement helps define and prescribe the
nature, structure, and parameters of the PCP-patient agreement – and comes
in handy. For example, when the desires of the patient (with no traceable
family members or friends) are not known. It is common in such cases to
Application and adaptation of Symphonology Bioethical Theory
972 HTS 64(2) 2008
appeal to the standard practice of the profession (statements like, “what would
a reasonable physician or patient do in a situation like this?” thereby including
both the so-called substituted judgment and the best interest standards).
7. THE APPLICATION OF BIOETHICAL STANDARDS TO
PASTORAL CARE
There are six standards upon which the SBT is based, namely, Autonomy;
Self-Assertiveness; Freedom; Beneficence; Objectivity and Fidelity, that under
gird the SBT. These standards are relevant to pastoral care practice and they
require that PCPs first have a clear self-understanding of, and satisfaction
with, their own level of spiritual and religious knowledge. Without such self-
understanding and satisfaction, a PCP will feel the need to either proselytise
or correct someone’s “wrong understanding” of the Bible, dogma or belief.
7.1 Autonomy
11
The idea of imago Dei in each person points to the standard of autonomy. It
implies that while each person is of equal value because each is equally made
in the image and likeness of God, each is uniquely made in this image and
likeness. Two themes immediately emerge from this understanding: autonomy
as both uniqueness and as ethical equality. As a bioethical standard in
pastoral care, autonomy means that a PCP will refrain from imposing his or
her own religious beliefs that are opposed to the patient’s with the goal of
changing the patient’s belief system; but allow a patient to express personal
stories any way, in whatever language (symbols) is comfortable to him or her,
without judging.
Patients will often tell what sounds like a bizarre story; stories like,
Jesus came to visit my room and was sitting on my bed. While a PCP may not
believe this, it is important for the PCP to hear the underlying message of this
patient. This may be a message of hope and comfort or even fear. So instead
of rejecting this as whimsical, a PCP may explore further with the patient to
“decode” the patient’s story. Something like, “sounds like you were comforted
11
Autonomy, as the derivative right of individuals to control personal information, has limits
though. Two principles limit personal autonomy. The “harm principle” requires moral agents to
refrain from acts and omissions which would foreseeably result in preventable harm to
innocent others and the “vulnerable principle.” This principle calls for duty to protect against
harm especially in a context where a patient is especially dependant on others. Being
vulnerable is a condition which involves both a relative inability of the vulnerable person
(patient) to protect oneself from harm and a correlative ability of another individual (PCP) to
act or refrain from actions which would foreseeably place a vulnerable person in a position of
harm or risk.
M M Khechane
HTS 64(2) 2008 973
by Jesus’ presence with you. Would you like to talk more about that?” or
simply ask, “what did that mean to you?”
7.2 Self-Assertiveness
The right to control one’s time and effort is important to any person. The PCP
should remind the patient of his or her right to self-assertiveness and
independence. This means that a patient should be empowered to make a
stand; even against the traditions of his or her own faith tradition, if that holds
him or her captive and stalls their progress. This is modelled by the invitation
God makes: “come let us reason together…” (Is 1:18). Here God gives his
people permission to be self-assertive.
7.3 Freedom
The patient must be enabled to face the reality of any given situation and
challenged to start building revised future stories from that point. Staying in
touch with reality means accepting one’s freedom to make projections into the
future and create one’s own future stories. The PCP, as one trained in
theology and as a spiritual leader, should offer an array of spiritual resources
from which the patient may choose. Although the patient has freedom by
virtue of being a person, freedom is enhanced when there are numerous
options from which to choose, without duress or pressure. Freedom also
means that the patient feels accepted for who he/she is by the PCP and that
he/she can express his/her displeasure and/or anger at God without fear of
sanction or being labelled one way or another.
7.4 Beneficence
In a PCP-patient relationship, a PCP’s actions and goodwill are directed
toward the patient. The standard of beneficence requires that a PCP be
conversant with diverse religious viewpoints, including that of his/her patient.
But this knowledge is not enough; he/she must be committed to respecting
different religious viewpoints of the patient; helping a patient see how the
resources of his/her own religion can help him/her cope with his/her current
situation. Beneficence requires a PCP to employ religious resources in a way
that will be helpful to the patient. This would mean using spiritual resources
such as prayer, sacraments and other rituals that may be meaningful to the
patient; all these with the goal of benefiting a patient. Beneficence for example
would demand that, if a patient voices a preference for a religious leader of a
different (from PCP’s) religious or spiritual persuasion, a PCP will make an
effort to locate such a leader for the patient.
Application and adaptation of Symphonology Bioethical Theory
974 HTS 64(2) 2008
7.5 Fidelity
While autonomy is the umbrella of the agreement – everything stems from
one’s core identity – fidelity is the foot of the agreement – if there is no
intention to be faithful, the agreement never was. This standard gives rise to
promises. As such, it means both a PCP and a patient owe each other this
trust. A trust, for example, that each party will keep promises. The PCP should
make it clear to the patient what a PCP can or cannot do in the health care
setting. Further, this standard forms the basis for confidentiality; the patient
must understand that what is discussed with the PCP is a privileged
communication and will therefore be treated with confidentiality.
7.6 Objectivity
When a PCP realises that there is no formula of how God works with His
children, the PCP would not be dogmatic on matters spiritual. It means being
able to say, “I don’t know” to questions such as “why did God allow my son to
die?” Objectivity communicates to the patient “although I am a PCP, I am
mortal like you are, my knowledge of God is limited” and that “God, and His
workings are as equally mysterious to me as they are to you”. For a patient,
objectivity means that he/she realises that the PCP does not have any magic
prayers that would drastically change his/her condition or situation, that the
PCP is equally a frail human being. It also means that when hearing a
person’s sacred story, a PCP must respect the language and symbols the
patient chooses to convey his/her sacred story. Objectivity means that the
future is quite open; God could work in either way. God may choose to heal
and may choose not to heal (physical healing). This standard requires a PCP
to never give false hope (such as the promise of physical healing over against
what those in the medical community are saying).
Finally, objectivity for the PCPs means that they are able to hold in
creative tension both the physical and spiritual realities. This, for example,
means that at times when patient’s prognosis may be grave, a PCP may have
to help a patient face up with this reality while at the same time upholding the
reality of life to come and thus giving a patient hope beyond this life.
8. CONCLUSION
Respect for human rights and personal autonomy is increasingly important in
today’s professional pastoral care practices. This article elaborated upon a
recently developed theory in the nursing profession (symphonology bioethical
theory: SBT) and showed how the application and adaptation of the SBT to
the pastoral care practice can rid pastoral care practice of its overly
traditionally paternalistic tendencies; while at the same time help restore
M M Khechane
HTS 64(2) 2008 975
patients’ dignity by respecting their personal autonomy and upholding their
human rights, cognisant of the fact that, given the derivative Latin meaning of
the word patient, PCPs are also patients (Patridge 1966:475 & Patton
2005:62).
The question, “can the two walk (work) together unless they are in
agreement?” posed at the onset served as the springboard for the discussion
of agreement between a pastoral care practitioner and a patient/counselee in
pastoral care and counselling situation. A definition of the word symphonology
(from Greek word, symphonia, meaning agreement) was provided from
Husted and Husted (2001:xviii) as “the study of agreements in the health care
arena between health care professionals and patients.” It is a study of the
ethical implications of the health care professional/patient agreement. It was
further indicated from the SBT perspective, that the professional-patient
agreement is structured, guided and defined by the six bioethical standards of
autonomy, freedom, objectivity, self-assertion, beneficence and fidelity.
Therefore properly understood and applied in pastoral care, SBT gives
not only meaning and structure to this PCP-patient agreement but it also
restores patients’ dignity and respect by upholding their human rights and
personal autonomy in decision-making. It answers the question, “how can a
PCP be in relation with the patient, the community (this includes both the
practitioner and or religious or civil communities) and God for the benefit of a
particular patient?” Therefore, to the question, “can the two walk together
unless they agree?” The answer is a resounding NO, they cannot! For them to
work/walk together, they have to agree!
I would like to conclude with a caveat. This article has focused on the
adaptation and application of the SBT in pastoral care practice; it was my idea
to supply a case study to illustrate how the adaptation and application could
be done. However, due to the space limitation, in the end I decided to leave
out the case study. In addition, since I am writing as an African, incorporating
the often-mentioned notion of ubuntu would have been in order. However, I
left it out for the same reason I left out a case study. I hope to incorporate it in
a sequel article to this one.
Works consulted
Buber, M 1958. I and Thou. New York: Charles Scribner.
Carter, M & Klugman, G 2001. Cultural engagement in clinical ethics: A model for
ethics consultation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10, 16-33.
Dayringer, R 1998. The heart of pastoral counselling: Healing through relationship.
New York: Haworth.
De Jongh van Arkel, J T 2000. Caring for all: Exploring the field of pastoral work.
Pretoria: University of South Africa.
Application and adaptation of Symphonology Bioethical Theory
976 HTS 64(2) 2008
Funke, S 2007. God’s representatives: A new look at imago Dei.
//www.bagpipeonline.com/index.php?path=/archives/000200.php,
accessed 16 May, 2007.
Geertz, C 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Gergen, K 1991. The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New
York: Basic Books.
Gula, M G 1996. Ethics in pastoral ministry. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
Hermans, C A M et al 2002. Social constructionism and theology. Netherlands: Brill.
Husted, G L & Husted, J H 2001. Ethical decision making in healthcare: The
symphonological approach. New York: Springer.
Kahle, P A 2004. The power of spirituality in therapy. New York: Haworth Pastoral
Press.
Lester, A D 1995. Hope in pastoral care and counselling. Louisville, KY: Westminster
John Knox.
Levy, J 1938. Relationship therapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 8, 65.
Lynch, G (ed) 1999. Clinical counselling in pastoral settings. London: Routledge.
North Carolina Army National Guard recruitment promotional. “… Chaplain Corps
Bringing God closer to the Soldier and the Soldier closer to God”, available at
//www.nc.ngb.army.mil/recruiting/documents/ChaplainFlyer.doc,
accessed 16 May, 2007.
Nouwen, H 1979. The wounded healer: Ministry in contemporary society. New York:
Image Books.
Partridge, E 1966. Origins: A short etymological dictionary of modern English. New
York: Macmillan.
Patton, J 2005. Pastoral care: An essential guide. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.
Purves, A 2004. Reconstructing pastoral theology. Louisville, KY: Westminster John
Knox.
Sperry, L 2001. Spirituality in clinical practice. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
Stewart, C W 1970. The minister as marriage counsellor. New York: Abingdon.