In what ways does the natural childbirth method attempt to reduce the mothers pain

1. Whitburn L, Jones L, Davey M, Small R. The meaning of labour pain: how the social environment and other contextual factors shape women’s experiences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(157):1–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Karlsdottir S, Halldorsdottir S, Lundgren I. The third paradigm in labour pain preparation and management: the childbearing woman's paradigm. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28(2):315–327. doi: 10.1111/scs.12061. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Jones L, Whitburn L, Davey M, Small R. Assessment of pain associated with childbirth: Women’s perspectives, preferences and solutions. Midwifery. 2015;31:708–712. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.03.012. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Lundgren I, Dahlberg K. Women's experience of pain during childbirth. Midwifery. 1998;14(2):105–110. doi: 10.1016/S0266-6138(98)90007-9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson J. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2012, 3). [PMC free article] [PubMed]

6. Anim‐Somuah M, Smyth RMD, Howell CJ. Epidural versus non‐epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;4. Art No.: CD000331. 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub2. [PubMed]

7. Sprawson E. Pain in labour and the intrapartum use of intramuscular opioids- how effective are they? Br J Midwifery. 2017;25(7):418–424. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2017.25.7.418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Burchell T, Coster S, Norman I. The effect of intrapartum pethidine on breastfeeding: a scoping review. Evidence Based Midwifery. 2016;14:49–56. [Google Scholar]

9. Littleford J. Effects on the fetus and newborn of maternal analgesia and anesthesia: a review. Can J Anesth. 2004;51(6):586–609. doi: 10.1007/BF03018403. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Chaillet N, Belaid L, Crochetiere C, Roy L, Gagne G, Moutquin J, Rossignol M, Duga M, Wassef M, Bonapace J. Nonpharmacologic approaches for pain management during labor compared with usual care: a meta-analysis. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care. 2014;41(2):122–136. doi: 10.1111/birt.12103. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, Armour M, Dahlen HG, Suganuma M. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3. Art. No.:CD009514. 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.pub2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

12. Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ӧ, Metin Gülmezoglu A. What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(4):529–539. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13819. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Downe S, Walsh D, Simpson L, Steen M: Template for metasynthesis. 2009, Contact: .

14. Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Carlsen B, Colvin C, Gülmezoglu M, et al. Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) PLoS Med. 2015;12(10):e1001895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8(45):28th November 2014. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: synthesising qualitative studies. London: Sage; 1988. [Google Scholar]

17. Walsh D, Downe S. Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery. 2006;22:108–119. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2005.05.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Larkin P, Begley C, Devane D. Women's preferences for childbirth experiences in the republic of Ireland; a mixed methods study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):19. 10.1186/s12884-016-1196-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

19. Mizuo C, Shiono E. Experiences leading up to childbirth by women who chose to have a painless delivery during pregnancy. Journal of Japan Academy of Midwifery. 2013;27(2):257–266. doi: 10.3418/jjam.27.257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Nikkola E, Läärä A, Hinkka S, Ekblad U, Kero P, Salonen M. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor does not always improve maternal satisfaction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(2):188–194. doi: 10.1080/00016340500409935. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Fyneface-Ogan S, Mato C, Anya S. Epidural anesthesia: views and outcomes of women in labor in a Nigerian hospital. Annals of African Medicine. 2009;8(4):250–256. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.59580. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Hasanzahraei R, Mehran N, Fathizadeh N, Abedi H. Epidural painless delivery: a phenomenology research. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2007;12(1):25–31. [Google Scholar]

23. Miquelutti M, Cecatti J, Makuch M. Antenatal education and the birthing experience of Brazilian women: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13:171. 10.1186/1471-2393-13-171. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

24. Levett K, Smith C, Bensoussan A. Dahlen H: he complementary therapies for labour and birth study making sense of labour and birth- experiences of women, partners and midwives of a complementary medicine antenatal education course. Midwifery. 2016;40:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.011. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Andrén K, Störholt L, Lundgren I. Women's experiences of tactile massage during the latent phase of labour. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research. 2005;25(4):10–14. doi: 10.1177/010740830502500403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Klimi A, Economidou E, Froudaki M, Mantoudi A. Music as a conditioning aid in the childbirth experience: a qualitative study. Hellenic Journal of Nursing. 2011;50(3):297–306. [Google Scholar]

27. Heinze S, Sleigh M. Epidural or no epidural anaesthesia: relationships between beliefs about childbirth and pain control choices. Journal or Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2003;21(4):323–333. doi: 10.1080/02646830310001622132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Dillaway H, Brubaker S. Intersectionality and childbirth: how women from different social locations discuss epidural use. Race, Gender and Class. 2006;13:16–42. [Google Scholar]

29. Yoshioka T, Yeo S, Fetters M. Experiences with epidural anaesthesia of Japanese women who had childbirth in the United States. Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012;26(3):326–333. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1328-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Goldberg H, Shorten A. Patient and provider perceptions of decision making about use of epidural analgesia during childbirth: a thematic analysis. J Perinat Educ. 2014;23(3):142–150. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.23.3.142. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Lally J, Thomson R, MacPhail S, Exley C. Pain relief in labour: a qualitative study to determine how to support women to make decisions about pain relief in labour. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14:6. 10.1186/1471-2393-14-6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

32. Jepson I, Keller K. The experience of giving birth with epidural analgesia. Women and Birth. 2014;27(2):98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.01.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Angle P, Landy C, Charles C, Yee J, Watson J, Kung R, Kronberg J, Halpern S, Lam D, Lie L, Streiner D. Phase 1 development of an index to measure the quality of neuraxial labour analgesia: exploring the perspectives of childbearing women. Canadian Journal Anaesthesia. 2010;57(5):468–478. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9289-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Doering K, Patterson J, Griffiths C. Japanese women's experiences of pharmacological pain relief in New Zealand. Women and Birth. 2014;27(2):121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2013.11.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Morris T, Schulman M. Race inequality in epidural use and regional anaesthesia failure in labor and birth: an examination of women's experience. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare. 2014;5(4):188–194. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2014.09.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Hidaka R, Callister L. Giving birth with epidural analgesia: the experience of first-time mothers. J Perinat Educ. 2012;21(1):24–35. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.1.24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Jantjes L, Strumpher J, Kotze W. The experience of childbirth in first-time mothers who received narcotic analgesics during the first stage of labour. Curationis. 2007;30(2):82–90. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v30i2.1079. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Duncan L, Bardacke N, Duncan LG, Bardacke N. Mindfulness-based childbirth and parenting education: promoting family mindfulness during the perinatal period. J Child Fam Stud. 2010;19:190–202. doi: 10.1007/s10826-009-9313-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Fisher C, Hauck Y, Bayes S, Byrne J: Participant experiences of mindfulness-based childbirth education: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2012, 12(1):126–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

40. Attanasio L, Kozhimannil K, Jou J, McPherson M, Camann W. Women's experiences with neuraxial labor analgesia in the listening to mothers II survey: a content analysis of open-ended responses. Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 2015;121(4):974–980. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000546. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Fleet J, Jones M, Belin I. Taking the alternative route: Women's experience of intranasal fentanyl, subcutaneous fentanyl or intramuscular pethidine for labour analgesia. Midwifery. 2017;53:15–19. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

42. Browning C. Using music during childbirth. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care. 2000;27(4):272–276. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00272.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

43. Tabarro C, de Campos L, Galli N, Novo N, Pereira V. Effect of the music in labor and newborn. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2010;44(2):441–448. doi: 10.1590/S0080-62342010000200029. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

44. Pierce B. Toning in pregnancy and labor. The Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health. 2001;15(3):217–223. [Google Scholar]

45. Kimber L. Reflective practice. How did it feel? An informal survey of massage techniques in labour. The Practising Midwife. 1998;1(12):38–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

46. Van der Gucht N, Lewis K. Women’s experiences of coping with pain during childbirth: a critical review of qualitative research. Midwifery. 2015;32:349–358. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.12.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

47. McAra-Couper J, Jones M, Smythe L. Caesarean-section, my body, my choice: the construction of ‘informed choice’ in relation to intervention in childbirth. Fem Psychol. 2011;0(0):1–17. [Google Scholar]

48. Cherniak D, Fisher J. Explaining obstetric interventionism: technical skills, common conceptualisations, or collective countertransference? Women's Stud Int Forum. 2008;31(4):270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2008.05.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

49. Kornelsen J, Hutton E, Munro S. Influences on decision making among primiparous women choosing elective caesarean section in the absence of medical indications: findings from a qualitative investigation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32(10):926–929. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34684-9. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

50. Leap N, Anderson T. The role of pain in normal birth and the empowerment of women. In: Downe S, editor. Normal childbirth: evidence and debate. 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. pp. 29–46. [Google Scholar]

51. Renfrew M, McFadden A, Bastos M, Campbell J, Channon A, Cheung N, Silva D, Downe S, Kennedy H, Malata A, McCormick F, Wick L, Declercq E. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–1145. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

52. Mollart L, Adams J, Foureur M: 2016. Pregnant women and health professional’s perceptions of complementary alternative medicine, and participation in a randomised controlled trial of acupressure for labour onset. 24, pp.167–173. Complementary therapies in clinical practice 2016, 24:167–173. [PubMed]

53. Williams J, Mitchell M. Midwifery managers’ views about the use of complementary therapies in the maternity services. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2007;13(2):129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2006.01.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

54. Hodnett E. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2002;186:S160–S172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4. Art. No.: CD004667. 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

56. Nikula P, Laukkala H, Pölkki T. Mothers' perceptions of labor support. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing. 2015;40(6):373–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

57. Simon R, Johnson K, Liddell J. Amount, source, and quality of support as predictors of women's birth evaluations. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care. 2016;43(3):226–232. doi: 10.1111/birt.12227. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

58. Nabukenya M, Kintu A, Wabule A, Muyingo M. Kwizera: knowledge, attitudes and use of labour analgesia among women at a low-income country antenatal clinic. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15:98. 10.1186/s12871-015-0078-9 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

59. Naithani U, Bharwal P, Chauhan S, Kumar D, Gupta S. Kirti: knowledge, attitude and acceptance of antenatal women toward labor analgesia and caesarean section in a medical college hospital in India. J Obstetric Anaesth Crit Care. 2011;1:13–20. [Google Scholar]

60. Olayemi O, Aimakhu C, Udoh E. Attitudes of patients to obstetric analgesia at the university college hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23(1):38–40. doi: 10.1080/0144361021000043209. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

61. Audu B, Yahaya U, Bukar M, El-Nafaty A, Abdullahi H, Kyari O. Desire for pain relief in labour in northeastern Nigeria. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology. 2009;1(2):053–057. [Google Scholar]

62. Callister L, Khalaf I, Semenic S, Kartchner R, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. The pain of childbirth: perceptions of culturally diverse women. Pain Management Nursing. 2003;4(4):145–154. doi: 10.1016/S1524-9042(03)00028-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

63. Fenwick J, Hauck Y, Downie J, Butt J. The childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Western Australian women. Midwifery. 2005;21(1):23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.07.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

64. Roberts L, Gulliver B, Fisher J, Cloves K. The coping with labor algorithm: an alternate pain assessment tool for the laboring woman. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health. 2010;55(2):107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.11.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

65. Howard E. An innovation in the assessment of labor pain. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017;31(2):96–98. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000246. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

66. Fairchild E, Roberts L, Zelman K, Michelli S, Hastings-Tolsman M. Implementation of Robert's coping with labor algorithm in a large tertiary care facility. Midwifery. 2017;50:208–218. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.008. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]


Page 2

Scoring criteria for quality appraisal

A: No, or few flaws. The study credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability are high;

B: Some flaws, unlikely to affect the credibility, transferability, dependability and/or confirmability of the study;

C: Some flaws that may affect the credibility, transferability, dependability and/or confirmability of the study.

D: Significant flaws that are very likely to affect the credibility, transferability, dependability and/or confirmability of the study.